Wikipedia

Software patents and free software

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gronky (talk | contribs) at 17:30, 10 March 2007 (→External links: two more good docs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Opposition to software patents is widespread in the free software community. In response, various mechanisms have been tried to defuse patents involving software. Some with a degree of success, others have met with debate and derision. These mechanisms highlight the view among vocal anti-"software patent" campaigners that the software patent debate is a black and white issue and that any patent involving or that might cover software is, without question, bad.[1]

Postions from the community

Community leaders such as Richard Stallman[2], Alan Cox[3], and Bruce Perens[4], and companies such as Red Hat [5] have worked to raise awareness of the problems of software patents for free software. Other visible community figures have also condemned software patents. Linus Torvalds is one example, and while he didn't get involved in the campaign against software patents, he did put his name to a joint letter with Alan Cox against software patents.[6]

Benefits of free software

Patent holders can require infringers of their patents to pay a fee for ongoing use of their patent, or to stop using the idea covered by the patent software i.e. stop using the software that used the patented idea. With free software, software users have the additional option of removing the patented feature from the software, allowing them to continue using of the software. [citation needed] This would not, however, prevent a free software user from having to pay damages for past infringement of the patent.

Problems for free software

It is quite common for patent holders to licence their patents in a way that requires a per-copy fee, however, obtaining such a licence is not possible for free software projects since requiring mandatory royalties is not permitted. [citation needed]

Other types of patent licences, such as those with a one-time worldwide payment are acceptable though.

Patent retaliation

"Patent retaliation" clauses are included in several free software licences, including version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPL). The goal of these clauses is to discourage the licensee (the user/recipient of the software) from suing the licensor (the provider/author of the software) for patent infringement by terminating the licence upon the initiation of such a lawsuit.

The Free Software Foundation included a narrow patent retaliation clause in drafts of version 3 of the GPL. The intent is to prevent users of free software from patenting their improvements upon the software, and then suing the original developers if subsequent upgrades to the free version infringe the patent.

Examples of broader clauses are those of the Apache licence and the Mozilla Public License.

Patent pools

Corporations with a vested interest in free and open source software developed a means to protect FOSS projects from the threats of patent suits by pooling patents into the Open Invention Network (OIN). The OIN is a company that acquires patents and offers them royalty free "to any company, institution or individual that agrees not to assert its patents against the Linux operating system or certain Linux-related applications".[7]

The OIN has the Commerce One patents that cover web services, which potentially threaten anyone who uses web services. The OIN's founders intend for these patents to encourage others to join, and to discourage legal threats against Linux and Linux-related applications. Along with several other projects, Mono is listed as a covered project.

IBM, Novell, Philips, Red Hat, and Sony founded the OIN November 10 2005.

References

  1. ^ The Dangers of Software Patents, Richard Stallman 2004, "Allowing someone to patent building a signaling machine to display lights to tell a train what to do, okay, I'm not an expert on how to run railways, but such a general patent that would cover what goes on in software would have to be rejected, or else we have to perhaps say we would have to say that it doesn't apply to the software."
  2. ^ http://www.ifso.ie/documents/rms-2004-05-24.html
  3. ^ "Alan Cox on software patents". 2005-08-01. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  4. ^ http://perens.com/Articles/Patents.html
  5. ^ [1]
  6. ^ http://www.effi.org/patentit/patents_torvalds_cox.html
  7. ^ "Open Invention Network formed to promote Linux and spur innovation globally through access to key patents". Open Invention Network. November 10, 2005. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: year (link)

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_patents_and_free_software&oldid=114092360"