Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worker file manager
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:39, 27 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 16:39, 27 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Kurykh 22:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Worker file manager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable software. No 3rd party sources to indicate how this software is notable. Almost no changes since the article was tagged back in May for notability issues so now its up for deletion. --Hdt83 Chat 19:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Advertising and no assertion of notability. --Fang Aili talk 19:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 70.110.164.36 23:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 10:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wonder why it was not a speedy. Vegaswikian 23:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.