Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point-accessibility operators for temporal logic

Point-accessibility operators for temporal logic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Original research. The user who created the page identifies as the author of the article in which the concept of point-accessibility operators in this sense was introduced for the first time, and on which the page is largely based on. The article itself was published in 2021 and has no citations. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 13:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Temporal logic maybe (it’s borderline), but it’s certainly not independently notable. Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 21:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would not be a very useful redirect, since the title is quite complicated and the page is an orphan. —Jähmefyysikko (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable logical operator, and deleting it isn't anyone's loss because it was copied from an open-access paper anyway. Might deserve a mention on temporal logic#Temporal operators, but the author being its inventor also makes it verge on promotion. Would not be useful as a redirect either. small jars tc 09:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I find notability as a criterion of the deletion quite strange, for the extension I present is quite notable: PA-operators are able to express the antique statistical operators, Priorian operators (both for linear and branching systems), and of course all particular examples of Von Wright's operators. If it helps, the article could be renamed as Temporal Operators. I intended to add definitions of the earlier operators to the article. Wikieditor 247 (talk) 13:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]