Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Management using PIIMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^{talk to me} 05:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Information Management using PIIMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I...I just don't see notability here. I may be wrong, but I'm confused... Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 03:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This appears to be just promotion of a website. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 06:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Seems to be advertising a non-notable website: This new method of managing information is by using PIIMS an interactive website..... The main purpose of the site is for information management by bridging the gap between information management and information managers. The information is efficiently and effectively managed by bring together information management and information managers into one central ___location. The site serves as a central network ___location for all of an individual’s information and application. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks like it clearly fails WP:PRODUCT and WP:CORP. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete: Excellent new concept on using a non-traditional method of data management. I was under the impression that wikipedia was a site for information on new ideas and concepts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.121.252.4 (talk) 01:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of common misconceptions about Wikipedia, this page lists a number of them. Qrsdogg (talk) 02:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.