Talk:Service layer pattern

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Izno (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 16 April 2023 (sect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 208.70.182.5 in topic Criticism Section?
WikiProject iconComputer science Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Untitled 2010 comment

I have started working on adding more inline citations. Thanks. The constant contributor (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Service Layer & Service Layers Pattern

The section Service layer in SOA describes a particular kind of service layer in an SOA whereas the Service Layers Pattern provides guidelines for creating multiple service layers according to different functional contexts, hence does not seem right to merge Service Layers Pattern with the Service Layer.The constant contributor (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Criticism Section?

I'd love to see a criticism section in this article. The service layers pattern generally just doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Of course, content in Wikipedia shouldn't be the editor's personal opinion, but I'm sure there are others out there who feel the same way as I do. (I just haven't found any yet, which is why I'd love to see a criticism section here...)

I'll see if I can do the necessary research and contribute such a section myself. If somebody else gets to it first, though, it would be awesome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.70.182.5 (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply