Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specified complexity
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Specified complexity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
According to the template, it fails WP:N and is possibly a hoax, for its accuracy and truthfulness is disputed. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Obvious pseudoscience, not notable for even being a misunderstanding, unlike intelligent design. Some of it could be merged into the authors' names. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Snowball keep: Recently applied tags notwithstanding, article seems well sourced. The topic has attracted enough scholarly commentary to demonstrate notability. Just plain Bill (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)