This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Procedural programming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | Computing: Software / CompSci Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Computer science Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Comparison with object-oriented programming
I would like to see less of the editorial slant in favor of OOP in that topic. For example, instead of using phrases like "it's undeniable that OOP is better at" please use phrases like "Many people believe that OOP is better at".
Also, I would like to see some more information about how procedural programming can be superior to OOP.