Flyguy649
|
Archive 1 (Nov 2, 2006 – Mar 31, 2007) |
 | This user is not an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify) |
Women and Muslim Society
Hello! I believe you deleted the article I posted in the Women and Muslim Society. I can cite NUMEROUS sources for my addendum. I thought that we were allowed to add content to Wikipedia. Was I incorrect? My email is idahobeef@yahoo.com if you would care to reply. Thanks, Damon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Idahobeef (talk • contribs) 03:24, April 1, 2007 (UTC)
- Hi there. I undid your addition of content that was unsourced and wasn't neutral point-of-view. If you have a source for it, feel free to add it back. Please see WP:A and WP:NPOV. Let me know if you have any further questions. Flyguy649talkcontribs 03:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
User:Operationmajoritypower's did not merit warnings
Hi. You gave Operationmajoritypower a uw-error2 warning for this edit[1] and a uw-error3 warning for this edit.[2]
If you look closely at those edits, you'll see that all this user did was reverse the order of the African American and white population numbers. See his explanations at Talk:Mullins, South Carolina and Talk:Orangeburg, South Carolina. Whether or not you agree with these editorial changes, they're not vandalism. I encourage you to consider striking through or erasing your warnings.
Thanks for your consideration. --A. B. (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The error notices were indeed given in error; I had mis-read the edits as swapping the percentages, rather than changing the order (perhaps as an April Fools prank). I have removed the userpage warnings, apologized to the user, and restored the one instance where the user's changes hadn't been fixed. I will leave notes on the two talk pages you mention above. Sheepishly, Flyguy649talkcontribs 19:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
RE: ANI Report
- Reply to original comment at User talk:Cascadia#I'm starting an ANI report
Thank you. Quite pissed me off when I reload the page and there sits my name called before a jury! I've used the nickname for a long time, and kept it when I started with Wikipedia because it really couldn't be taken any way other than the region. Cascadia TALK| HISTORY 03:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- I have admitted that I should not have filed your name already, Cascadia. Since it was all over in about 12 minutes it seems like a minor matter already addressed by the 3 hour block. As you may know, I had to spend a much longer period of time defending my own twice-approved username. Sorry for the inconvenience, though. Cheers! TortureIsWrong 19:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- I saw your block report... I did indeed comment ;-). Cascadia TALK| HISTORY 03:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
RFCN
- Response to a comment on this user's talk page at User talk:Wooyi#New style of RFCN
Thank you for coming up with the idea and posting on the RFCN talk page as well. I confronted with RFCN page first time when I was going through my fellow editor Tohru Honda13's contribution for her RFA nomination, and when I saw RFCN I found the discussion board horrendously flawed. I hope the proposal gets implemented sooner so less people will get mad at it. Cheers! Wooyi 18:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, but it was User:Ryanpostlethwaite who came up with it. I merely agreed. Regardless, it's a good idea. Cheers, Flyguy649talkcontribs 18:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD
Reply to a note at User_talk:TreveX#AfD re: AfDs for Avit Avner and BWitty
WOOPS! Thanks so much for that :-D
TreveXtalk 18:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- No problem! Flyguy649talkcontribs 18:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Re:
Re: note I left Lakers about an incomplete AfD here
Hey sorry about that I was really busy, the user said it was never his intention I think he is just creating articles but is not aware of reliable sources etc, thanks. Lakers 18:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Suitability for a checkuser request?
Hmm... sounds like a sticky situation, certainly. The older accounts will probably be stale (too old to check), but it couldn't hurt to submit a request for IP check (and perhaps blocking), if these guys are a persistent problem. If you need any help with that, feel free to let me know. – Luna Santin (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, sounds good. :) – Luna Santin (talk) 05:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Everything looks to be in order, we'll see if the CUs take up the request. – Luna Santin (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I left a note on the creator of this page's talk page here.
Hello, I am new to wikipedia. I was wondering if you could untag "MBAs Without Borders" as having too many buzzwords. Its basically just a broad summary of what that organization does, and broadly put, how they do it. Also, could you make recommendations on how to clean it up a little more to meet wikipedia standards? Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aleinwan (talk • contribs) 06:16, April 11, 2007 (UTC)
- Reply at user's talk page. Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Please introduce yourself first
Thanks for your "thank you" introduction,but under what power are you deleting my references? We have free speech in Internet and an opportunity of sharing our opinion about the specific topics.There are numerous wrong statements in the chapter Persecution in Azerbaijan which need to be corrected.In order to be objective and for the purpose of widening the knowldge of the reader,I provided the link to http://www.human.az/ which contains the report from Human Rights Report.Why on Earth are you deleting this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Befairtoturks (talk • contribs) 03:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
- Actually, I didn't do any of the reversions, as you can see from the article's Page History. One of Wikipedia's guidelines is WP:BOLD, but your additions were reverted four times, which must be happening for a reason. Your posts, combined with your username, suggested that you are not adding WP:NPOV material. In addition, your changes ([3], [4], [5], and [6]) were removing sourced material on Anti-Armenianism. I gave you a level 1 warning to draw your attention to policy. It is preferable to make significant changes, especially if they are getting reverted, by discussing them first on the article's talk page. As for "free speech on the Internet," I suggest you read Wikipedia's policies. Start with WP:FREE, and WP:NOT#SOAP. Also look at the the five core policies, WP:5. I realize articles on historic wrongs committed (or allegedly committed) by one group tend to draw strong opinions, and tend to develop a point of view. Your additions may be valuable contributions; just please frame them correctly. It also helps when you make changes to use the Edit summary box to leave a brief note as to what you are changing and why. If it's a major change, leave an note to look at the talk page, and then discuss it there.Flyguy649talkcontribs 03:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Notability
Possibly, about the individual members, but the band The Hungry Hungry Hypocrites is notable. Ebang 03:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Well, he's been around since 2005 (despite a lack of edits), and the previous edits seem to be unrelated to the band (never mind, just saw Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hungry Hungry Hypocrites), so I figure the account was compromised. However, Luna Santin did the actual block. --Coredesat 04:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Misterneo
This user has been creating Lambros ballas and related pages and running into problems with notability and speedy deletion. See his talk page. hey, i see that you're helping me trying hard to and i REALLY appreciate it, i am just having a hard time understand what the heck i am doing wrong. I had my page up for almost 2 weeks and it was fine, i made 1 change and all kinds of crazines happened, can you possibly help me, i'd appreciate it. I'm supposed to get this done a long time ago its late where i am and i have to get up early for work soon, if i give you all the information it's all verifiable by phone, fax, or on the nasd website most of it. can you please?
thanks in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Misterneo (talk • contribs) 05:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
- Reply on User's talk page User_talk:Misterneo#Reply. Flyguy649talkcontribs 05:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Can you PLEASE help me i'm so confused i had the page up fine for a week, and i made like one change it it got deleted. If i give you all the info it's VERY short can you fix it for me so it won't get deleted. I'd greatly appreciate. Misterneo 05:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC) april 21st 1:25am
- Thanks for helping me i appreciate it soooo much. Misterneo 05:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Torrisholme vandals
Yeah, I'd go ahead and do that. They're obviously sock or meatpuppets, which can be treated the same for blocking purposes. I didn't even realize there were a bunch of them. Natalie 17:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what the process is for sockpuppet IPs. At WP:SOCK, though, there is a template for sock IPs that might be helpful. I'll block the accounts you listed. Natalie 18:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppet tagging
Hello Flyguy649. I noticed you tagged a blocked user as a sockpuppet, but did not indicate that the user was blocked. Did you know that the sockpuppet templates can indicate a block themselves? For example:
| Usage | Code |
|---|---|
| Not blocked | {{sockpuppet|username}} |
| Blocked (suspected) | {{sockpuppet|username|blocked}} |
| Blocked (confirmed) | {{sockpuppet|username|confirmed}} |
| Blocked (proven by CheckUser) | {{sockpuppetCheckuser|username|checkuser subpage}} |
Thanks. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 20:27:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- my reply is here. Flyguy649talkcontribs 22:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I was not vandalizing Viewpoint School
I added useful information that was necessary about their new no tolerance policy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Danleretard (talk • contribs) 05:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- These were your additions to the page: [7] (self-reverted), [8] and [9], both reverted by me. Plus you vandalised other pages. I stand by my warnings. Flyguy649talkcontribs 05:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
i go to this school and i dont like it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Science 10 (talk • contribs) 07:01, April 15, 2007 (UTC)
- School's good for you. And please stop vandalizing. Flyguy649talkcontribs 07:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Ketchup chips
Could you please put the ketchup page back up? It would be greatly appreciated. Dan Kou would also appreciate this. He is a ketchup chip fanatic! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nickmoe (talk • contribs) 23:53, April 16, 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't delete it; only an administrator can do that. You'd have to look in the deletion log to see who did and ask them to undelete it. Flyguy649talkcontribs 03:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)