Template:Arbitration case implementation notes/Proposal/Automatic/doc

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SilverLocust (talk | contribs) at 07:30, 12 September 2024 (Moved documentation from the template to its /doc). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is an experimental version of Template:Arbitration Committee implementation notes/Proposal that automatically detects new votes as they are added. It uses the same parameters for the most part. However, support=, oppose=, and abstain= can be left blank for automatic detection.

Example appearance

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision—at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion to close the case until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

These notes were last updated by automatic template check; the last edit to this page was on 07:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC) by SilverLocust.

Proposed principles
Number Proposal name Support Oppose Abstain Status Support needed Notes
1.3 Example appearance 0 0 0 Not passing Cannot pass
1.4 Example ????Error: Found 0 sections with heading
===Example===
0 0 Not passing Cannot pass
Proposed findings of fact
Number Proposal name Support Oppose Abstain Status Support needed Notes
None proposed
Proposed remedies
Number Proposal name Support Oppose Abstain Status Support needed Notes
None proposed
Proposed enforcement
Number Proposal name Support Oppose Abstain Status Support needed Notes
None proposed

Notes