Miranda
Thanks
Thanks for your help. Now that I know that, I doubt I'll ever be able to use AWB. Thanks a lot for your help and have a nice day. -- iguana_nirvana14 (talk · contribs)
Thank you
I would like to thank you for helping me with my problem. have a great wikibreak!!-politices rule 6:11 pm est.
...I've replied... anthony[review] 21:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Leaky bottoms?
Look what happened when someone added another comment to User talk:68.39.174.238. (see how it actually looked at bottom of page) When I moved the userboxbottom to a separate line it "got better". Y'all got me spooked now. ;-) Shenme 00:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ooh, my bad. I will fix it later. Real96 00:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Reverted
Can you please stop reverting my talk page? I don't understand how the removal of old user specific messages can be considered as vandalism? Thanks 144.135.1.196 07:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keeping the page history is crucial in order to know the pattern of vandalism on this page. Real96 07:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Please block 124.191.195.52
See this page. -- Sandycx (Talk) 08:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- I can't block a user, because I am not an administrator. If the user has a persistent pattern of vandalism and has been given the proper warnings, please report to WP:AIV. Real96 18:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Alpha Phi Alpha and the Omega Phi Psi Pages and Fort Des Moines
The listing you have on the Alpha Phi Alpha page about Fort Des Moines is incorrect. It is about Omega Psi Phi. Why did you change it back, and said i was a vandalize Wikipedia for making the correction?
- Please talk this out on the Alpha Phi Alpha talk page, and please sign your comments with four tildes. Thanks! Real96 18:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Werdnabot having trouble?
WerdnaBot hasn't been archiving my page lately. Can someone fix it?
- Try Miszabot to archive your page. Real96 18:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Now will the new bot archive every 7 days on my talk? WikiMan53 (talk) (sign?) 19:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Place this code in your page, it archives messages left after seven days. In "archive," place the directory where you want your talk page to be archived. (i.e. User talk:WikiMan53/April).
- Now will the new bot archive every 7 days on my talk? WikiMan53 (talk) (sign?) 19:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(7d)
|archive =
}}
-- Real96 19:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Did I do it right? Can you check please? WikiMan53 (talk) (sign?) 19:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
(reduce indent) Yes, you did it right. Real96 19:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, is there a note that says Msza Bot archives this page to blah blah blah? WikiMan53 (talk) (sign?) 19:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- I will watch the page to see if Misza bot does it right. Real96 00:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Alpha Phi Alpha
Just wondering why you reverted my edit on Alpha Phi Alpha where I added a verylong tag. The article is quite long and could be broken up. Jmlk17 00:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- The article is an FA. If the article was too long, before the FA, the article would have been broken up prior to FA status. There are much longer FA articles on Wikipedia. If you have any questions about this, please go to the talk page of the article. Thanks. Real96 00:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Logs
Per your response on User talk:98E#Help!, you don't need to be an admin to see a log, just to see the deleted page. Anyone can view the logs at Special:Log. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 01:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oops, I didn't see you corrected it, ignore the above. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 01:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Artaxiad
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan
- Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Artaxiad
I believe there is a "third wave".
- Ashkani (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) - likely created few days ago
- Jamie Mercer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) - possible (if so it is a leftover sleeper - could be innocent)
-- Cat chi? 03:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hello all but I am confused why I wasn't notified about alleged sock puppetry against my account. Artaxiad and Jamie Mercer are irrelevant to me thus these accusations should cease. If there was a problem regarding other users they should have contacted me directly so I can improve my editing within the community that is all I ask thank you. Ashkani 05:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
DefCon
Thank you :) MojoTas 04:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Adoption
Thanks for graduating me. But what I found weird, I have only asked you one question. lol. ^_^ Sodaplayer talk contrib ^_^ 01:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes you pretty much know how to make templates. I am going to place another welcome template for you to know the policies (I forgot to do that last time) :-(. Real96 01:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok thanks!! ^_^ Sodaplayer talk contrib ^_^ 01:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
help
hello. i'm semi-new to wiki. i LOVE it. i love reverting pages b\c of vandalism as well as writing articles.
i seem to be having a problem on porky pig's feat with the user thomas logan. we have reverted his posts several times. i have warned him, you have warned him and he just got warned by MartinBot who identified another post he made as vandalism.
i'm unsure how to proceed and would love to learn the steps. i checked out teh 'report abuse' page but it indicates that you shouldnt report the person there unless they have been blocked at least 5 times. so i was wondering where should i report him for the repeated vandalizing ?
thank you for your time, any help would be much appreciated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew Yeager (talk • contribs) 07:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC).
- I reported him to WP:AIV. Real96 07:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- thank you, now i know where to go for this. he just re-vandalismed the page. i reverted it again. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP! is there any other places i should know about to report people when needed ? Matthew Yeager 07:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Check the instructions on WP:ANI. Real96 15:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- thank you, now i know where to go for this. he just re-vandalismed the page. i reverted it again. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP! is there any other places i should know about to report people when needed ? Matthew Yeager 07:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
WASP article
It could have been made more clear by noting these things. There was nothing said that was uncivil. I cleared your comments because you seemed to misunderstand or confuse something (assuming that the changes were of quotes rather than comparing). No biggie, we're all human and again, I am sure I could have made it clear earlier but this stuff is far down my priorities. I would say it would help if you would check before speaking about "reporting" and "vandalism", that you might want to be sure to compare edits or send something sans that sort of language. Thanks for taking the time and effort.
Real 96 you are wrong, the pages wasn't blanked and this seems to have become an error that you are not correcting, retracting or making note of. There is no edit in the history of that article where the page was blanked or the quotes changed. Surely I didn't "blank" that page. You might want to take those comments down from this page, if only to not seem so off base. I hope you are not engaging in vandalism Real 96 because there is something of personal contention (in what is probably an objective article, haven't read the whole thing). I hope you are trying your best to make things better. I like your articles and I would be surprised if it was otherwise. Thanks!
- First, please sign your posts. Second, you removed content without providing an edit summary. If you would have provided an edit summary of what you removed, I wouldn't have suspected what you were doing. You should have said "removed unsourced/original research" information. If you remove content from a page, that's considered vandalism. Thanks. Real96 14:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Vilina Vlas
Thanks for dealing with the deletion at the article on Vilina Vlas. --Opbeith 08:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- I don't remember voting on this...Real96 15:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Is this vandalism? It kinda looks like vandalism, what with all the long words with stringsssssssssss of letters in and RANDOM INSULTS IN CAPITAL LETTERS, YOU FOOL! The question is, will an unsuspecting FNORD FNORD FNORD Twinkle user be daft enough to revert it???????????????????????? I actually have the edit toolbar turned off, so I'm even going to have to type this bit out by hand, Bold text Italic text moo bar woeigoerhigmh &%$£". Anyway, hi – Gurch 19:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Gurch, seriously. SERIOUSLY?!?! :-) Real96 19:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Deletion
Thanks a lot :) I will keep note of the template for use by myself in future.--Scheibenzahl 22:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Like this?
REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 09:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes! I love it! Real96 09:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Excuse meh?
User: NFAN3 has his myspace page on his wikipedia page and nobody sayd anything to himm...>=[ Push It Baby!! ..Dats Muh Song!!..=] (Tay) 20:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I happen to agree with her on this point; I don't think that a simple link to a Myspace site is using Wikipedia as a social networking site. Veinor (talk to me) 21:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I feel that since Tay's page looks like a personal webpage, and not containing a brief overview of what she does on wikipedia (although, I admit, I have VANITY on my page). However, I am following WP:NOT#WEBSPACE and WP:PRIVACY on this case. Real96 21:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
lemme see i have a section dat says "page i created" and that list that says my fav pages is actually alll on my recent changes patroll list and besides if NFAN3 can do it I can do and thanks for the support Veinor..=] Push It Baby!! ..Dats Muh Song!!..=] (Tay) 00:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Three revert rule
Send also a warning to User:Ned Scott as well. I find it unfair that he doesn't get a similar warning as well. Also, would it be okay if I add {{fact}} tags due to the numerous vioaltions of Wikipedia: verifiability per the dispute here? Am I permitted to do that??--293.xx.xxx.xx 05:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please discuss the source of conflict on the talk page of the article. This will be the best thing to do. Real96 05:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Cooling off first. But I refuse to speak with the anonymous editor anymore. I can't be leading him by the hand all the time. --293.xx.xxx.xx 05:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)