Talk:Error correction code

	This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Telecommunications Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of Forward error correction was merged into Error correction code on 19 September 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that ___location, see its talk page.

Copied most of the material on this page from Forward_error_correction based upon discussion at Talk:Forward_error_correction#Misleading_title_-_split_the_article
For earlier talk see Talk:Forward_error_correcion Tom94022 (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Satellites around Uranus?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article includes the following example of a FEC benefit: "Long-latency connections also benefit; in the case of a satellite orbiting Uranus, retransmission due to errors can create a delay of five hours". Please correct me if I'm wrong, but pretty sure there are currently no (nor have there ever been) man-made, transmitting satellites around Uranus. What an odd example, why not cite Juno orbiting Jupiter, or the MRO orbiting Mars? Jsinnreich (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

বিজ্ঞান

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

ব্লক করা সম্পর্কে প্রজেক্ট 103.78.253.128 (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply