|
Hi Cyberjunkie, I noticed you protected page Aquinas College, Adelaide due to random and senseless vandalism. Is there any chance you can do the same to St. Mark's College (University of Adelaide) too, for much the same reason? Cheers, ABVS1936 04:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- I don't think protection is yet necessary, but I'm watching to see if the situation worsens. Regards, --cj | talk 12:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
If you're in bed now, you might not sleep through it - you'd better be in bed now! :p – Riana ऋ 15:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC) I'm not awake, either... Reply
- Hey, it was nice to finally meet you! Enjoyed it, we should do one of these again sometime at a decent hour :) Take care, – Riana ऋ 01:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- It was lovely to see all the Adelaidean folk! It's nice to have faces to put to usernames. I look forward to the next rendezvous – so long as it's not a morning. Happy editing, --cj | talk 01:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Nice meeting you, cj. Daniel Bryant 01:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- And likewise. It was good to see that your Wikipedia eloquence is just as noticeable in the real world. Cheers, michael talk 10:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Just realised I forgot about the meetup today. Monday morning are like that -- too bad... Hope it went well! Donama 23:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Point taken - it should all be at Politics project talk page not mine - I just couldnt bear watching all that high importance summaries fly through my watch list when i knew they were not happening :) SatuSuro 13:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Now copied to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australian_politics thought I should let you know - cheers SatuSuro 13:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- (posted to here also) Again as I said before I am just in on the periphery of this (politics is not my interest in terms of assesment) but it is obviously important for me to confirm again that the part that CJ indicates above as superflous is most definitely not (I have learned via errors that are caused particularly with the script that he and I are both using from Outriggr) The break created by the comment allows the script to separate its taks and if not included the Outriggr script adjusts the importance for both the parent and the child project.--VS talk 13:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Breakfast was interesting. I have written notes from the edu event and will type them up and blog them. Would be nice to do something where Adelaide's leaders in wp and wm are more visible as technology leaders/participants to the edu sector. Perhpas opportunities to show what you do in schools or at local community computing events? Do you think Adelaide wm folks would be interested in doing that kind of thing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lucychili (talk • contribs) 23:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC).Reply
- Thanks cj understood re speaking at edu sector stuff.
- I will blog the stuff that was said at the Adelaide seminar. (my notes are a bit scetchy near the questions but the main bit I did get some notes for.) JW's general gist was changing the education sector's reliance on 'gatekeepers' and learning how to use 'accountability' as a means of structuring information and activities. This means participation is the bottomline and good community practice is important. I'm hoping to follow up with talks or projects re wikithinking in schools so they can see why read write culture is useful/important to them. I also have a card game I have been working on to model copyleft/copyright. [[1]] Lucychili 03:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your attention paid to Indonesia articles today. Even if it is 'just' vandalism or inappropriate edit reversion, it is great to see others involved. --Merbabu 13:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC) I'll second that! SatuSuro 13:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Ps, nice gallery too. I want to add to mine too. --Merbabu 13:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks!--cj | talk 13:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for deleting all that useless information on the Nowra page. That page needed a good cleanup and I'd been meaning to do it for a while. JRG 13:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- No worries! Regards, --cj | talk 13:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
heheh userpage b-----d by another b----y sock all in five minutes - thanks :) SatuSuro 15:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I was wondering why the Great Barrier Reef article was sprotected for so long? Vandalism is common on this high profile article, but is reverted by several editors frequently who have it on their watch list. Was there a high profile threat to it until May 6 or was this action requested for some other reason? Thanks. --MattWright (talk) 16:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
|
