Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service
Talk:Killing of Austin Metcalf
The prior RfC ended in "no consensus" when the suspect was a minor and uncharged. He is now eighteen and was indicted for first-degree murder. Should their name be included in the article?
FrodoMarsh (talk) 17:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Temporary account IP-viewer
What should the minimum criteria for granting the TAIV user right right be? 17:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters
RFCBEFORE: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#It is time we talked about Google Ngram
Discussion at RSN: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Google N-grams and 'consistent' answers
Should Google Ngram be deprecated in rename/move discussions?
- Yes
- No
Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria
Should understandability be added to the featured article criteria? And if so, which wording should be used?
- It should be added to the well-written criterion as
- well-written: its prose is engaging, understandable to a broad audience, and of a professional standard;
- well-written: its prose is engaging, understandable to its audience, and of a professional standard;
- It should be a separate criterion: 1g. Understandable to its audience.
- Status quo: no explicit mention
This RfC seeks to establish clear inclusion criteria for the "Notable People" list, following a dispute over recent large-scale additions of individuals with primarily local careers. Murkut23 (talk) 18:24, 13 June 2025 (UTC)