Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia proposals

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

Should the site tagline display featured and good content status in the following style?

London Beer Flood

A featured article from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of English words containing Q not followed by U

A featured list from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archaeological interest of Pedra da Gávea

A good article from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All horses are the same color

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 19:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion

This has been brought up from time to time at WP:RFD in the past few years, so here's the respective discussion and question: Should the main RfD be redesigned to hide older active nominations from directly appearing on the main RfD page? Steel1943 (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations

With the backlog of unreviewed GANs increasing (see Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Is it time for quid pro quo?), should we restrict nominations displayed on the GAN page to those meeting certain criteria? 11:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Temporary account IP-viewer

What should the minimum criteria for granting the TAIV user right right be? 17:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria

Should understandability be added to the featured article criteria? And if so, which wording should be used?

1. It should be added to the well-written criterion as
   1. well-written: its prose is engaging, understandable to a broad audience, and of a professional standard;
   2. well-written: its prose is engaging, understandable to its audience, and of a professional standard;
2. It should be a separate criterion: 1g. Understandable to its audience.
3. Status quo: no explicit mention

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)	Biographies (bio) Economy, trade, and companies (econ) History and geography (hist) Language and linguistics (lang) Maths, science, and technology (sci) Media, the arts, and architecture (media) Politics, government, and law (pol) Religion and philosophy (reli) Society, sports, and culture (soc)
Non-articles (All)	Wikipedia style and naming (style) Wikipedia policies and guidelines (policy) WikiProjects and collaborations (proj) Wikipedia technical issues and templates (tech) Wikipedia proposals (prop) Unsorted
Instructions	To add a discussion to this list: Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.