Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stations
Should the historical proposal at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (stations) be replaced with a short updated naming convention guideline that links to the established more detailed region-specific station naming conventions and describes their points of commonality? Tomiĉo (talk) 22:20, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation
This question is about the terminology to be used when a draft is not accepted but may be reworked or improved and resubmitted. This action is currently referred to in the AFC Helper script and at the messages provided to the author as being Declined. There has been discussion at the Village Pump at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Declined_vs_rejected_at_AfC. Should the terminology for the three possible actions by a reviewer be:
- A - Accepted, Declined, and Rejected? (The present options)
- B - Accepted, Not Accepted, and Rejected? (The rough consensus at VPM)
- C - Something else, please specify.
Wikipedia talk:Speedy deletion
Should the following criterion be added to G15? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:44, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Should WP:AIGI be modified to incorporate MOS:AIUPSCALE? D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 21:48, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Talk:Killing of Austin Metcalf
The prior RfC ended in "no consensus" when the suspect was a minor and uncharged. He is now eighteen and was indicted for first-degree murder. Should their name be included in the article?
FrodoMarsh (talk) 17:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)