| Submission declined on 13 August 2025 by Avgeekamfot (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Software engineering analytics refers to the practice of collecting, measuring, and analysing data related to the process of software development, with the goal of improving engineering efficiency, quality, and predictability.[1] It encompasses a range of metrics, tools, and methodologies used by engineering leaders and development teams to monitor productivity, identify bottlenecks, and inform decision-making.
Software engineering analytics draws from fields including software metrics, project management, DevOps, and data analytics. Modern implementations often integrate directly with source control systems, issue trackers, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines to provide real-time insights into engineering workflows.[2]
History
editThe concept evolved from early software metrics research in the 1970s and 1980s, which focused on measures such as lines of code and function points.[3] In the 1990s, methodologies like Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) incorporated measurement into process improvement frameworks.
In the 2010s, the rise of Agile and DevOps practices shifted focus toward continuous measurement and improvement. Google’s "Four Keys" research and the publication of the DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) metrics provided standardised indicators—deployment frequency, lead time for changes, mean time to recovery, and change failure rate—that became widely adopted benchmarks.[4]
By the early 2020s, venture-backed startups began offering commercial platforms that automate data collection and analysis for engineering teams. These include workflow-focused platforms such as LinearB and AI-driven solutions such as WorkWeave.
Metrics
editCommon metrics in software engineering analytics include:
Productivity and velocity: Cycle time, throughput, and sprint burndown rates.
Quality: Defect rates, escaped bugs, and test coverage.
Delivery performance: DORA metrics.
Collaboration: Code review turnaround, pull request size, and reviewer participation.
AI-assisted development impact: Output share from AI-generated code, code review efficiency improvements.
Tools
editSoftware engineering analytics tools integrate with platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jira, and CI/CD systems. They often include dashboards, workflow automation, and alerting systems to help teams respond to issues in real time.[5]
Prominent examples include:
LinearB: A workflow analytics and automation platform.
WorkWeave: An AI-driven developer productivity platform that benchmarks output and quality using machine learning.
Open source tools such as SonarQube and custom in-house analytics pipelines.
Challenges
editThe field faces several challenges:
Metric misuse: Overemphasis on output-based measures can lead to gaming behaviours.
Data quality: Incomplete or inconsistent source data can distort insights.
Cultural adoption: Developers may view analytics as surveillance rather than as a means of improvement.
Contextual interpretation: Metrics need to be analysed alongside qualitative context to avoid misleading conclusions.
Recent developments
editRecent trends in software engineering analytics include:
Integration of generative artificial intelligence to assess code quality and estimate effort.
Industry-wide benchmarking to compare team performance across organisations.
Increased focus on developer experience metrics alongside traditional delivery performance.
Privacy-preserving analytics to address concerns about individual monitoring.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Hassan, Ahmed E. (2014). "The Road Ahead for Mining Software Repository Data". Future of Software Engineering: 48–57. doi:10.1145/2593882.2593883.
- ^ "Measuring Software Delivery Performance". DORA. Retrieved 12 August 2025.
- ^ Fenton, Norman (2014). Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. CRC Press.
- ^ Forsgren, Nicole; Humble, Jez; Kim, Gene (2018). Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps. IT Revolution Press.
- ^ "Best Engineering Analytics Tools for 2025". Gartner. Retrieved 12 August 2025.