Pythoncoder
| This is Pythoncoder's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
 | This user is a regular, and is indifferent to being templated. You may choose to template or not template him at your own discretion. |
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pythoncoder. |
Draft: National Students for Justice in Palestine
editHi @Pythoncoder! I recently contested a request for speedy deletion on my draft page for National Students for Justice in Palestine. I understand pages and edits made around the Arab–Israeli conflict require you to be an extended confirmed editor, this makes sense! However, even if I am not able to contribute myself, I would like to propose that an extended confirmed editor take this page up. Thank you! Smartgopher (talk) 22:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Han-Oh Park Submission declined
editHello, @Pythoncoder!
After reviewing your feedback, I confirmed that there were errors in the sources I asked AI to write in wiki markup. I can say with certainty that I provided AI with the sources I had checked and used them only for citation formatting assistance.
In any case, I regret that I was not careful enough and have corrected all of the errors.
I have also improved my draft to reflect your previous comments about neutrality, avoiding promotional language, and verifying sources.
I would appreciate it if you could review the updated draft when you have time, and let me know if there are any further concerns or areas for improvement.
Thank you. SYParkOfBioneer (talk) 08:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Draft: Thomas DeMark
editHi @Pythoncoder, I appreciate your suggestions and made a couple edits that I think will be beneficial. I’m trying to learn Wiki so that I can contribute to other pages for technical analysts. I am using AI to help learn all of the Wiki rules but I will be mindful of your comments and do better. Wave618 (talk) 20:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I don’t recommend using AI on Wikipedia as it is prone to hallucinations. I’ve posted some links on your talk page that may help you on your editing journey. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, I feel like I’ve been making progress with my edits of finance pages since joining and learning the Wiki manual of style. Do you have any suggestions about where I can improve? Wave618 (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi Pythoncoder, Request
editThe draft you previously rejected had not been created yet; I had only added an infobox. I have now completed it. Please review it. Thank you.
Draft:Remona Evette Pereira Novaclia (talk) 12:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- User was globally locked for socking —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
|
Text generated by a large language model (LLM) or similar tool has been collapsed per relevant Wikipedia guidelines. LLM-generated arguments should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |
|
Thank you for reviewing my submission of the QBF Fraud article. I appreciate your detailed feedback regarding concerns about potential AI-generated content. I have substantially revised the article to address each of your specific points: 1. Addressing promotional tone: The revised article maintains strict Wikipedia neutrality throughout. For example, rather than using subjective language, it presents facts objectively: "CySEC imposed administrative fines totaling €25,900" alongside the documented "€70-100 million in investor losses," allowing readers to draw their own conclusions.
Every claim is now supported by specific, verifiable details including: → Exact case numbers (Criminal case No. 12001450007000902, Cyprus District Court Case 525/2022) → Precise financial figures (₽974 million transferred by the Borzenkov family) → Specific dates for all legal proceedings and regulatory actions → Named individuals with their exact roles and sentences 3. Encyclopedic structure: The article now follows standard Wikipedia format with: A properly formatted criminal case infobox Clear section headers following established Wikipedia conventions Factual presentation without editorial commentary Appropriate categorization and cross-references 4. Verifiable sources: All references are to real, accessible sources: - Primary court documents uploaded to Wikimedia Commons - Official CySEC regulatory decisions with direct URLs Major Russian media outlets (Forbes Russia, Kommersant) with specific article dates - Cyprus court judgments from the official cylaw.org database 5. Original synthesis: Rather than paraphrasing single sources, the article synthesizes information from multiple authoritative sources, creating original summary tables and integrating facts from Russian prosecutorial documents, Cyprus court proceedings, and regulatory filings. The revised article draws primarily from court documents, regulatory decisions, and established media sources, presenting a factual account of one of Russia's largest cross-border financial fraud cases. I believe these revisions fully address your concerns and meet Wikipedia's standards for well-sourced, neutral content.
| |
Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at User talk:Mixalakix, you may be blocked from editing. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:14, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
- Mixalakix (talk) 18:56, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Congratulations on upgrading from copy-pasting from LLMs to copy-pasting from the talk page header. I’m still not sure whether you have read or comprehended my previous messages regarding your use of LLMs being inappropriate, but here’s another bulleted list of links that I believe are relevant here:
- —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:21, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
I need To make an article so please give me rights o make article if there is any problem about my account tel me know
YAKSH75 (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, do you have a specific question regarding my draft review? —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:25, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- LET ME KNOW WHAT MISTAKES I DONE SO I CAN IMPROVE AND MY DRAFTED ARTICLE WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE MAIN ARTICLE YAKSH75 (talk) 13:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
George D. Ellsworth
editHi Pythoncoder, Can you please tell me why you are setting up my page for deletion. Could you also tell me how to stop it from getting deleted. I made this page for a family member and I would like to keep it. Thanks, Logan LoganPollard331 (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I did not nominate your page for deletion. If you wish to voice your opinion that the page should be kept, you can go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George D. Ellsworth, but make sure your arguments are backed up by Wikipedia’s guidelines — see WP:AADD for advice on this. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:04, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for thinking you nominated my page for deletion. Thanks for the info, I'll definitely take a look.
- Have a good evenin. LoganPollard331 (talk) 00:53, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello
editI already converted the U14 World Cup Part 13 page into English. Rafael2345 (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- (user was indef blocked for sockpuppetry) —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:17, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Submission of my draft review
editHi @Pythoncoder , thank you for reviewing my draft on Avra Banerjee. I noticed that the submission was declined with the reason that it contains promotional or advertising content. Could you kindly help me understand specifically which parts of the article or which sources were considered promotional? I’d like to revise it to meet Wikipedia’s neutrality and sourcing standards, but I want to make sure I correct the appropriate sections. Swtysinha (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with everything that was said at the AfC help desk. In particular, I would like to once again strongly discourage you from using AI chatbots when editing Wikipedia. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:23, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Request regarding speedy deletion of Draft:Jaxay Shah
editHi Pythoncoder,
Thank you for reviewing my draft Draft:Jaxay Shah. I noticed it was tagged for speedy deletion under G11 for promotional content.
I’d appreciate any brief guidance you could give on which parts of the article felt promotional to you. I’m open to revising it to meet neutrality and sourcing standards if possible.
Thank you for your time and contributions! — ~~~~ Azaadi 2801 (talk) 09:57, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- I just read Qcne’s advice on your talk page, and I agree with what he said. The purpose of Wikipedia articles are not to convince you of how great a person/company is, it’s to describe facts about them as neutrally as possible with high quality sources. Also, please don’t use ChatGPT to edit pages. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
You declined this draft twice, stating that it appeared to have been written by a large language model. I have reviewed it, and I don't see the tells of a large language model, but I know that some of those signs are only obvious to those who know what to look for. I have moved it to Draft:Exodus Wallet. If you still see evidence that it was generated by AI, there is a new speedy deletion criterion, G15. If you still think it is AI slop, you can tag it. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:00, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I’ve talked with the page creator on their talkpage since that second decline, and they have revised the page to verify the content, fix some of the markup, and add sources. I think the main tell for me was the use of narrow nonbreaking spaces, an extremely obscure Unicode character that ChatGPT loves to insert in between proper names for some reason. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:17, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
PEP Buddy Topic Rejected
editHi, I agree that my post took the help of LLMs. But the information and 25+ sources are absolutely correct and free of the bias because its quoting independent research articles.
Let me know what needs to be done more.
Thanks
Rao Abdul Hannan (talk) 16:53, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Contrary to your claims, I found multiple instances of promotional language in the article (“innovative”, “representing an advancement…”). Also, the “media coverage” sections are inappropriate for an encyclopedia article — LLMs tend to get so hung up on notability that their algorithms seem to think it’s a good idea to throw in as many possibly-relevant sources as possible into lists, instead of writing prose and using sources to back up the claims in said prose, like a human would. My suggestion is that you read Your First Article and rewrite the draft in your own words. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Draft: Michael Malone
editHi @Pythoncoder!
Thank you for the feedback on the draft article noted above, I am very new to this. I have re-written it. I have used AI in order to have correct format for the references. I believe this page will interest many editors due to Michael's contribution towards Irish History and am only trying to begin the page to kickstart that. I am open to more feedback in order to ensure the article is approved.
Peerwikipeer1916 (talk) Peerwikipeer1916 (talk) 21:26, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Trouted
edit
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Zeus1134 (talk) 13:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC) This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage? What's that even supposed to mean I've been asked to translate the ALREADY EXISTING PAGE in macedonian language to English? why was it declined?!?!?!
- While I can see that the Macedonian version of the page doesn’t have any references either, it is a requirement on the English Wikipedia that all biographies of living people be backed up by reliable sources. I can see that you’ve added a few since I declined your draft, though reference #1 looks like it has a couple missing fields that need to be filled in. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
A pie for you!
edit
|
For your friendly attitude to newcomers. Thank you. Millentrix (talk) 16:11, 11 August 2025 (UTC) |
Help to understand a comment from you
editHello
You wrote the 15th August 2025 on this review: Comment: Screenshot has unclear copyright status; currently discussing on uploader’s Commons talk page —pythoncoder (UTC) The page was here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dstroy May I ask what to do moving forward about it please ? Thank you Nicolas riviere (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- The image is a screenshot from a video game, and the copyright to those is normally owned by the company that published the video game. You uploaded the image to Wikimedia Commons, which only allows images released under a free license — see c:Commons:Licensing for more on this. Since the image File:Dstroy.png is probably copyrighted, I have nominated it for deletion. If you do have the rights to use the image and you can provide proof, you can email the Volunteer Response Team.
- Wikipedia does allow you to upload copyrighted images under fair use, but only for use in published articles, not drafts. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:16, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Great, Thx
- The picture I included in this article is there since 2006 it seems, and was not uploaded by myself, and is a part of a screenshot of the game.
- I am one of the creator of the original game, I can get in contact with the team about it. Even though, a better screenshot made by us would of course be more legit, but I don't know how to place that into wikicommons without being strike down. Nicolas riviere (talk) 09:22, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
Worldwide view of perpetual copyright
editHello, I noticed that you added the {{globalize}} tag to perpetual copyright, so I added examples from Cuba, Denmark, Ireland and Uruguay. How sufficient do you think that my edits address your concerns? Best, --Minoa (talk) 17:40, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good. I'll remove the tag —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:52, 19 August 2025 (UTC)