Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia proposals
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Should the Contents link be removed from the sidebar? Interstellarity (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Last year, we implemented a process of admin elections. However, there was little discussion on if we should include bureaucrat elections, which I personally think that we should. I am implementing this RfC to ask the community what they think of implementing these kinds of elections, maybe like every year or 2. Should we implement bureaucrat elections the same way we do with admin elections? Interstellarity (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
We had an RFC earlier this year around how to handle LLM/AI generated comments. That resulted in WP:HATGPT after further discussion at WT:TPG. Recently, an editor started a requested move using LLM generated content. I ran that content through two different AI/LLM detection utilities: GPT Zero says "highly confident", and 100% AI generated; Quillbot stated 72% of the text was likely AI generated.
Should HATGPT be expanded to allow for the closure of discussions seeking community input (RFC/VPR/CENT/RFAR/AFD/RM/TFD/RFD/FFD/etc) that are started utilizing content that registers as being majority written by AI?
I was tempted to just start an RFC on this, but if there's alternate proposals or an existing WP:PAG that already covers this, I'm all ears. =) —Locke Cole • t • c 00:38, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Should the icons in the message box module be updated from the current Ambox ones to the Codex ones? 13:56, 11 August 2025 (UTC)