User talk:John Carter/Archive May 2007

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) at 20:27, 15 May 2007 (Automated archival of 8 sections from User talk:Warlordjohncarter). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Maverick423 in topic Its finally here!

Hildegard of Bingen

I agree with you on the rating, but there is already an objection on the talk page. Bascisally, it sounds like "because I can't rate it "core" for bio, I want it in "top" for saints." The other rationale is that she is more important than Anthony of Padua or Columba - to which I say Then lets put them in the category that they belong. -- Pastordavid 14:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

DYK

  Did you know? was updated. On 29 March, 2007, a fact from the article Jonah of Manchuria, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 23:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Festivals

hey

You gave me a good idea the other day. I would like to ask you how can i go along and merge the Festivals project with the Holidays project?? im really interested in expanding the knowlage of festvials from around the world but its hard doing it alone. any help is much appreciated Maverick423 05:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Thanks much for your help and your participation on the project is much appreciated =)Maverick423 02:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok i have placed some new task for the project they are basic ones such as making tamplets and such. If you got any suggestions add it to the suggested Task paragraph that im about to make. I hope we can make this project work out. As far as the Holiday project request, they havent replyed at all to it so i take it that they either dont care or that their project is inactive at the moment. well my friend thanks for all your help and all help that will come from you =) Maverick423 16:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hope you dont mind me bothering you with this too much but heres another update. Wikiproject Holidays have responded and they have declared that both our project and their project become sister projects since holidays and festivals sometimes do overlap. well my friend now that that is over with im going to update you when we got some festivals that you would seem intrested in. i read what you wrote so when we get stuch on some christian festivals we will know where to look =) take care Maverick423 14:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good then. well once i get the project fully working, ill be able to look for festivals to add and such. I understand about the saint projects and by all means you gotta do what you gotta do. and you do such a great job at it too as i see most of the ones you contribute to become featured articles! well like i said when you got some time stop on by =P Maverick423 14:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks much for making that new templet it taught me how to make one. however i cannot link the templet to a page like you did with the one you made how do you do this? thanks Maverick423 17:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

A Poll has been placed on the festival project talk page. whenever you have time please vote. thanks Maverick423 13:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Saint portal

I undid some of your work at the saints portal. No offense taken, okay? I'll comment over there. --evrik (talk) 22:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
The Saints' Star

I award this Barnstar for their great efforts on saints artilces.--evrik (talk) 17:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

VA articles

Hi, Excuse me what is the relationship between Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/VA tagging and Wikipedia:Vital articles. I added some articles in WP:VA but I can't find them in Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/VA tagging--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 09:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thorlac Thornalli

  Did you know? was updated. On 2 April, 2007, a fact from the article Thorlac Thornalli, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

AFter seeing your work in couple of places I begun to wonder if you could help with couple of my missing topics pages about religions and mythology? - Skysmith 14:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alexander of Bergamo

  Did you know? was updated. On 4 April, 2007, a fact from the article Alexander of Bergamo, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 23:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

DYK

  Did you know? was updated. On 5 April, 2007, a fact from the article Barbatus of Benevento, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 09:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:MEC

Heya, I was wondering how our missing LGBT articles list is going? Our bot has finished our list now at around the 7000 mark, you can see it all here. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Antoninus of Sorrento and Catellus of Castellammare

  Did you know? was updated. On 7 April, 2007, a fact from the article Antoninus of Sorrento, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.
  Did you know? was updated. On 7 April, 2007, a fact from the article Catellus of Castellammare, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

Thanks for the templates! Your help is much appreciated! As well as your participation.. Lighthead 01:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The next step is creating a wikistub...but I can do that. There's quite alot of Kabbalah articles that are stubs. There's one that has mention of Jewish mysticism but it has a Judaism stub. But that one's as good as ours. There's not much debate. Lighthead 01:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I did the Kabbalah portal. How do you think the Header's can be reworked so that they're not italicized? Let me know. Lighthead 21:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Delaware

You think so? I'm not quite sure, just b/c I seem to be the only one doing anything with it. But, if you think it'll get more involvement if I let it loose, might as well give it the ol' college try! EaglesFanInTampa (formerly Jimbo) 17:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe I should read before I talk. Never mind; I see exactly what you mean, and yes, I'll get it moved to its own page. I've just been so swamped that I (shamefully) admit I haven't given this project as much TLC as it needs these past couple weeks. Thanks for the heads-up and good looking out...moving now! EaglesFanInTampa (formerly Jimbo) 17:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes, thank you! I can always use the help. Gimme a day or so to get a free moment and I'll figure out where we all can focus our energy. EaglesFanInTampa (formerly Jimbo) 18:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I guess

I have a stupid question (as I'm sort of out of the loop); what is a banner is it the template that designates the project; the one we have that's red and white? I know it's a stupid question, face it I'll look it up, but let me know just in case I haven't found the answer. Thanks. Lighthead 21:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

That seems unprofessional or no?

If you can make it look right do it; but have you already put up banners on the article talk pages cause I haven't. I'll check right now just in case you don't answer soon. Lighthead 21:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm putting up...

I'm putting up more of those banners as we speak... Lighthead 21:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

You should

You should archive your messages.. Lighthead 21:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I took a look at that template

I took a look, yeah that seems right go ahead and do that; I'll just place those banners in as many articles as possible right now; the main one's just in case I don't finish are the ones from the "infobox" (is that right?). So go ahead. Lighthead 22:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

So in other words

So we have to create 30 different versions of the stubs? Ay yay yay... To be perfectly honest there's not even that many kabbalah related pictures in Wikimedia Commons. So. I guess. Lighthead 22:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I understand now there have to be 30 said stubs. I'll make the list right now. Lighthead 22:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

50

There are exactly 50 Kabbalic articles in all categories dealing with Kabbalah that are stubs. So. Lighthead 23:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Input

John, I am having a discussion with another editor about categorization; in particular, whether it is appropriate to remove articles from the Category:Lutheran denominations, and organize them into the more specific sub-cats Category:Lutheran World Federation members and Category:International Lutheran Council members. I will probably post something to the WP:Lutheranism talk page, but I wanted to get some input from you whether I am following the right reasoning on this. Thanks in advance. -- Pastordavid 23:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The guy that I'm talking to...

The guy that I'm talking to says that they usually take your word for it in terms of the 50; should I take his word for it? Lighthead 02:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Maine

You removed this one, but I can't find the project page. Help? Chris 03:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, John! Chris 22:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Could you tell me

Could you tell me what I asked you a little while ago; about how to remove the italics on the Kabbalah portal. Lighthead 06:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

For example Selected Article

No I'm talking about in the portal itself, you know how it says Selected Article, or Selected Biography; it's italicized. I was wondering how to undo it, because I don't see anything like that in the template. I'll double check just to make sure. Lighthead 21:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Reply

Abāmūn of Tukh

  On 11 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Abāmūn of Tukh, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

recent changes.

Gnostic Saint

I'm afraid you simply duplicated material in another article, which is the correct place for the material in the first place. Jefferson Anderson 21:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I took the italics off

You were right, I'm surprised I didn't see it before. Lighthead 22:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC) I'm sorry if I was redundant before. Lighthead 22:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tell me...

Tell me if you like the new layout for the portal. It looks like a Lego set! Portal:Kabbalah. Lighthead 03:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Now you can see the edit portions of the Wikiproject and Wikiportal parts. It's not blinded by the white. Lighthead 03:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do you know how to...

Do you know how to make the subject in the related portals more like the one in the Religion portal. With logos and the text just like that? If you do; could you do it and include these portals; Judaism, Occult, and Spirituality. Lighthead 21:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I justed posted my query there right now. Lighthead 21:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Augustine of Fangi

John, could you take another look at Augustine Fangi (and Talk), since I've significantly expanded it? I think it's a pretty solid start class now.

By the way, thanks for all the work you do for the Saints project. You do an inspiring amount of work in regards to DYKs and performing article ratings. I think the Saints WP is honestly one of the best-organized and best-represented WPs, entirely made possible by tireless editors such as yourself. I see you've already gotten two Saint Barnstars, so without further ado, it is my honor to bestow upon you...

  The Working Man's Barnstar
For your tireless and painstaking edits in regards to WikiProject Saints and Wikipedia in general! Alekjds talk 02:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


-- Alekjds talk 02:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


WikiProject Chile

I see that you started the proposal about the project. I have been recruiting people with a lot of edits realted to Chile so we can start the project soon. I found it very difficult to organize such a project, do you have any ideas for the sections and areas of work? The project also needs templates, and possibly also Chile-barnstars. So wend do you think we can start the project? Dentren | Talk 02:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Its finally here!

Hey i finally finished the festival newsletter!! =)

here it is in the non flooding format =)

{{Festival Newsletter}}.

feel free to add more stuff to it if youd like and if you want to receive next months issue then put a NL next to your name on the project page if u just want the link like the one i just posted above (which i feel is better as it doesnt flood the page) then just add the word (link) after your name.

Heres to the future of the project may it continue to expand and prosper with the help of editors like you =) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maverick423 (talkcontribs) 21:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC).Reply