LOLCODE is not notable. It was created only 6 days ago. It made the front pages of Digg, Reddit, and del.icio.us, but that does not make LOLCODE notable. There are no reliable sources reporting on LOLCODE. Vudicarus 22:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Only secondary source I can find is ScienceBlogs. Hardly enough. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 22:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Merge to Lolcat for now. This one may become notable in the future (but I doubt it...) -- BPMullins | Talk 23:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. We have articles on other nonsense languages. Why not this? — Taggard (Complain) 23:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because this one doesn't have any reliable sources asserting, or supporting notability --Haemo 23:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per my comments above. --Haemo 23:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The only source is the language's official website (and other personal sites). It has an external link at lolcat - that's about all that can be justified at the moment. If it receives non-blog outside coverage, it can always be remade. --- RockMFR 01:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Hilarious, but non-notable. -- Kesh 01:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - A majority of the article is a copyvio of [1] and [2]. That moves this to Speedy Delete G12 territory. -- Kesh 07:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable fictional programming language. —ptk✰fgs 03:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not notable -- Powerlord 06:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Much as I love lolcode, I don't think it's notable enough for inclusion yet. A sentence or two about it in Lolcat would be more appropriate. -- VitriolUK 10:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete for now. It presently lacks notability, but it may merit inclusion should it become non-fictional. Ian¹³/t 11:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)