Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klingon programming

Hoax, said episode of Star Trek has no such content. Episode 71 was The Mark of Gideon, which had nothing like what the episode described, then again no episode did. Wingsandsword 04:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Google only finds iterations of a humour article. Production episode 071, Whom Gods Destroy, also has nothing to do with this, unsurprisingly. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 06:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If some of the "academic literature in Computer Science" stating this is a common alternate name for Extreme Programming can be provided and sourced, I might be brought around to redirect this. Failing that, beam it into a volcano. -- saberwyn 10:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The humour articles are quite good though. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 12:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even a funny hoax. zadignose 14:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neologism. JJL 17:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Talk about outsourcing. Besides, their customer support is terrible. ("Today is a good day for your computer to die.") Clarityfiend 19:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Computer: This is the Editor. Article Destruct Sequence. Code CSD, A1, G1, 3 *boom* LaughingVulcan 04:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]