Majorly
Welcome to Majorly's talk page.
MAJORLY
|
Guidelines |
|
I have ended all participation with Wikipedia, so will not be replying to any further messages left here. Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page by starting a new thread, using a descriptive header. Is your comment missing? It's probably in my archives. I will normally answer on this page. Please note that the talkback template is officially banned on this page! :) So don't use it here; I watch your talk if I've left you a note. Thanks! |
|
Archives |
|
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30 • 31 • 32 • 33 • 34 • 35 • 36 • 37 • 38 • 39 • 40 • 41 • 42 • 43 • 44 • 45 • 46 • 47 • 48 • 49 • 50 • 51 • 52 • 53 • 54 • 55 • 56 • 57 • 58 • 59 • 60 • 61 • 62 • 63 • 64 • 65 • 66 • 67 • 68 • 69 • 70 |
:-)
Here's a ptarmigan for you! Ptarmigans somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Húsönd 02:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Brawl revert?
I am a little unsure as to why you edited my attempt at archival at the Super Smash Bros. Brawl talk page. Perhaps I made a mistake during the process or something... either way, there's now a rather large conflict between the talk page and its 15th archive, and I'm mildly peeved at the work it would take to fix it. =/ Arrow 13:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- It looked like you were blanking it. An edit summary would help greatly next time. Majorly (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, I would have thought it was a blank too. Use of an edit summary stating your intentions would have prevented it. Wikidan829 14:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Majorly Day
This is a little random, but I think having June 8 of this year as your day was cool. I also think you're a good contributor here. If in the heat of moment I say something that seems uncivil to you, I'm sorry. BH (T|C) (Go Red Sox!) 15:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I am *really* confused. First off, why did you remove the admiral insignia? And secondly, why does it still appear in the article despite being taken out? I tried two different browsers and page purge. -N 18:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- How odd, it just disappeared. That's some server lag we've got. Still, I'm reverting the removal. -N 18:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Now really, are you going to argue the insignia designs aren't really PD? First off, show me where the consensus says this. And use more descriptive edit summaries. -N 19:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Image:Admiral insignia.gif. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -N 19:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Whitelisting a web-site for persistant spamming
Per my report here at ANI, and a prior case at WP:ANI which led to its semi-protected status once (or twice?) before, I am curious as to what you believe in the spam link. The general consensus is to remove the fan site, but the reverts continue from various IPs based upon that Howard Stearn has its own fan spam. I'm not affiliated with the articles in any way, and only saw the case through ANI. I requested semi-protect earlier but was probably jumping the gun since there was not enough activity at the time to justify it, but if the persistance continues, could a request be made for the link to be whitelisted? Just curious, Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know. Does it really need whitelisting? Majorly (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's being continuously spammed, despite administrator actions in the past, consensus at WP:ANI (prior case), and consensus by other editors through reverts. Like today. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't you mean blacklisted, if it's a bad link? Majorly (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. I saw whitelisted mentioned somewhere, and for some reason, that stuck with me. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't you mean blacklisted, if it's a bad link? Majorly (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's being continuously spammed, despite administrator actions in the past, consensus at WP:ANI (prior case), and consensus by other editors through reverts. Like today. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Utopian Drums and Time Lords
Hi, could you not have just semi-protected the pages, since they're only being vandalised by IPs (it's not a dispute; they're adding unsourced information and comments such as "get off your high-horse").--Rambutan (talk) 07:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- It was a dispute. Majorly (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
It wasn't: facts on WP must have a listed source using <cite> or [http://www.example.com], but the info being added didn't, so they were wrong.--Rambutan (talk) 13:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Actually some people may care
It is interesting that right above my post (that you removed) is a small discussion about schools that have banned wikipedia from their campuses. my post was on a school that fails its students because of citing wikipedia in scholarly reports. So i guess it does tie in with the article above and some people may care. As they will see a patern of higher education and their attitude towards wikipedia. and thanks for the little smiley faces after removing the post, arent you so cute.
Famous Hoax article
Question. There was a famous wikipedia hoax article about a fictitious war with Canada for Michigan’s upper peninsula. I don’t remember how I came across it. Can anyone direct me to that page?
--Billwsu 03:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi Majorly, thank you for your note of support at my RfA. Shyamal 04:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Fan-cr*p
Hi, I’ve made a proposal here, about fan-cr*p on Doctor Who articles in the wake of a broadcast. Any opinions?--Rambutan (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Haelstrom 01:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete my user page?
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)