Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constant Data Base

Constant Data Base

Delete - Article is not notable, discusses a commonly implemented data structure. Would be better as a section in an article about programming theory or database theory. The largest part of the article is about Dan Bernstein's implementation of a CDB, in which case, it may be relevant to discuss CDBs there as well. A seperate article with little information is pointless. As such, this article does not contain enough information to establish notability per WP:Notability. --nenolod File:Sigpaw.gif (talk) 07:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to cdb per Dhartung. (updated concept) --nenolod (talk) (edits) 08:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note that I created a stub for this subject as cdb, which was expanded significantly by an anon; it may as well be considered part of this nomination. John Vandenberg 08:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The stub is not interesting to me at this time. I am against nominating the stub as part of this. --nenolod File:Sigpaw.gif (talk) 09:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, this library/database is used in a number of very notable pieces of software. John Vandenberg 08:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a specific database or library, but instead a design paradigm. This should be a section in an article about database design. I have yet to determine a good candidate for a merge, however. --nenolod File:Sigpaw.gif (talk) 09:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to cdb. There is really no other notable implementation (no, this isn't a "commonly implemented data structure", either). --Dhartung | Talk 10:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a fair solution. I think this is what should happen. --nenolod (talk) (edits) 22:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]