Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nibblecode

Alleged computing term. Unreferenced neologism. -- RHaworth 19:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failure to assert notability in violation of WP:N. Interesting as the proposal may be, this is probably original research, and may fall into the category of stuff made up in school in one day. There are precisely two Ghits on this term, one of which is the article itself. --Nonstopdrivel 20:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete per WP:NFT. — brighterorange (talk) 00:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Neologism. I have worked on three Major VM projects and i can assure you the idea has never been thought of, never been used, not feasable and completely original to the author. -- Jimmi Hugh 12:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per notability comments above. Debivort 06:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]