Wikipedia:Peer review/Geography of Newfoundland and Labrador/archive1
The article is dreadfully written. Among the problems that I could point out are:
- atrocious grammar and syntax leading to incomprehensibility in places;
- preposterous diction which would do a bureaucrat proud;
- use of unexplained technical terms that make reading difficult for the uninitiated;
- use of Imperial measurements throughout without conversions to SI.
- at least one reference to a thing that doesn't exist (namely the railway -- that packed up years ago).
It's a big job, and I may get around to it myself someday. Right now, though, this is an AWFUL article.Kelisi 01:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree completely. I will do what I can.Silverchemist 06:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)