Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textpattern

Textpattern

Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:VERIFY, it does not have any coverage by well known reliable third party sources. Jackaranga 17:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

del nn. `'Míkka 18:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable within the web-dev world (speaking from experience of having worked with it and observed the community around it), subject of a forthcoming book from a respected tech publisher. Ubernostrum 18:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, looks like the book was published in May, which means it's now the subject of a published book from a respected tech publisher. Ubernostrum 03:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Also see this list of sources for information on notability. Ubernostrum 18:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although sources could be better. At worst merge with textile (markup language) or TextDrive, or to a new article on Dean Allen. --Dhartung | Talk 23:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CitiCat^♫ 03:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not the greatest article we have, but this is notable, and the subject of "multiple non-trivial published works" (to coin a phrase) --Xorkl000 09:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 04:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Xork1000. KTC 04:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]