Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Matiia

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Matiia

ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Matiia talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

• Languages: es, en-2
• Personal info: (English)
  Hi.

  I've thought a lot about this, and as we need more active stewards, I've decided to nominate myself for stewardship. I registered on Wikimedia projects in 2014 and I've been a very active Wikimedian since then. My native language is Spanish, I can speak English at an intermediate level and I understand a few other Romance languages on a basic level. I started doing global counter vandalism/spam in 2014 and became a global rollbacker, a global sysop and an admin here on Meta-Wiki in 2015. I'm also a local op on a few Wikimedia IRC channels. As you may see here, this is my second nomination for stewardship (I've gained more experience since then).

  I mainly focus on anti-vandalism/spam work, but I try to help users as well (mainly in Spanish language IRC channels and on OTRS).

  As a steward, I'd like to help out granting/removing local ^{bots too} and global user rights, locking/gblocking spambots/spammers/vandals/LTAs, handling miscellaneous requests, etc (I'll try to help on any page where I think I can be useful). I'm daily available on IRC, so I can help out with requests made via IRC as well. Thanks for your time :). Matiia (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Matiia

English: You are not eligible to vote. More information

  Yes

2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Excellent candidate, in my opinion even the best-suited in the candidate pool. Vogone (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
4. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Matiia's activity is great and exactly what we need for a steward. His comportment is also flawless and in the answers to the SE questions he has shown that he understands the policies very well. --MF-W 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
5. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Stryn (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
6. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Active, trusted, and helpful. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
7. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  per Vogone KPFC 💬 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
8. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Vituzzu (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
9. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
10. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  per Vogone. Trusted and competend user, with a lot of croswiki experience. —Ah3kal (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
11. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  GZWDer (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
12. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Good to go! Good to go! And Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
13. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
14. Lingveno (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Lingveno (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
15. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Obviously qualified. Give him the tools! Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
16. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
17. OJJ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Good candidate. --OJJ (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
18. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 • The user has been quite active in the last time in cross-wiki vandalism patrolling. Candidate ideal to be part of the stewards team. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
19. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Excellent candidate Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
20. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Approved by the cabal. SPQRobin (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
21. JFG (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Totally legit. JFG (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
22. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  well, good to go Pearli (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
23. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Of course Yeza (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
24. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Miniapolis 15:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
25. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  — regards, Revi 15:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
26. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  It appears that he will be a solid contributor; he understands the expectations, appears even-handed and is multilingual, which Wikipedia needs more of. Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
27. Cookie (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Trusted and always helpful. Anna (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
28. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Good and relevant experience and very comprehensive answers — NickK (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
29. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Érico (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
30. Satnam S Virdi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Satnam S Virdi (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
31. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  B20180 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

       Gorlingor (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan) •  Gorlingor (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

32. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  QEDK (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
33. Ooo86 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Ooo86 (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
34. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Excellent candidate Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
35. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  MZaplotnik ^(contribs) 17:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
36. Neonek12 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Neonek12 (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
37. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
38. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 • -- Cameron11598 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
39. Kipsde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kipsde (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
40. Kirsan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kirsan (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
41. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Ankry (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
42. Balles2601 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Balles2601 (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
43. CAPTAIN RAJU (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
44. Nungalpiriggal (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Nungalpiriggal (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
45. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
46. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I'm glad he relented and decided to run! Great candidate of course. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
47. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Luke081515 18:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
48. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
49. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
50. DatGuy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  DatGuy (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
51. Raimundo Pastor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Experiencia, ilusión, y objetivos claros. Raimundo Pastor (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
52. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Milad A380 ^talk 19:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
53. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Aledownload (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
54. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Elvesham (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
55. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Helmy oved 20:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
56. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Ascánder (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
57. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Definitely. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
58. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
59. Rax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Rax (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
60. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  per MF-W DCB (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

61. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Hoo man (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
62. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Alan ^(talk) 22:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

       Ayagaures 0 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Ayagaures 0 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

63. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Thank you for your help reverting vandalism on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
64. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  rxy (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
65. RadiX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Long overdue. Outstanding candidate. RadiX∞ 00:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
66. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  — xaosflux ^Talk 00:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
67. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Courcelles 01:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
68. MechQuester (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  MechQuester (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
69. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Did not vote on his RfS last year because it was "too soon", perfect now :) Stemoc 02:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
70. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
71. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
72. NasssaNser (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  NasssaNser (talk) 04:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
73. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mirer (talk) 05:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
74. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  Shizhao (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
75. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
76. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by TBloemink)2017 •  InsaneHacker (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
77. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017 •  — TBloemink _talk 11:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
78. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rzuwig^► 11:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
79. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  спасибо за вашу помощь, в том числе на IRC Gryllida 11:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Openskye (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

80. Pokéfan95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Pokéfan95 (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
81. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Excelent user! Good luck! Leon saudanha (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
82. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
83. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Udo T. (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
84. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --geo ^») 15:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
85. CheChe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Great candidate. Best of luck. CheChe (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
86. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  BDaniel (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
87. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
88. Ankax Hayastan (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Hayordi (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

       Cpiebtanz (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Cpiebtanz (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

89. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
90. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ghilt (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
91. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
92. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~Cybularny ^Speak? 19:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
93. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Very active, competent and trustworthy, an excellent candidate in my opinion. Syum90 (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
94. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
95. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Just like last year: a no-brainer. He's trusted, active and certainly helpful. Trijnstel_talk 20:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
96. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  -Xbony2 (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
97. Sebek Adamowicz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Sebek Adamowicz (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
98. Barras (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Yes please. A very good choice! Barras talk 21:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

       Theo10011 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Theo10011 (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

99. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  lNeverCry 02:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Earthscent (talk) 02:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

100. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Esmost (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
101. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  A bit early I admit, but seems ready. OneMember (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
102. Taichi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Taichi - (あ！) 08:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
103. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --Caligatus (talk) 09:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
104. Moheen Reeyad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~ Moheen ^(talk) 10:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
105. Hume42 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Hume42 (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
106. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Epìdosis 14:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
107. CaroleHenson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  CaroleHenson (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
108. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

        John Locke (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Yes //John Locke (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

109. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  It would be a great steward Samuele2002 (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
110. Sakhalinio (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Sakhalinio (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
111. SR5 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  SR5 (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
112. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Full Rune (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
113. Henryk Borawski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Henryk Borawski (talk) 05:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
114. Hydriz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Hydriz (talk) 06:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  No

2. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Nuhaa (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
3. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Alex Khimich (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
4. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  The Banner (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Not enough knowledge of other languages[reply]
5. Complainer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Very promising candidate, but I think it's too soon. Complainer (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
6. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Slowking4 (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
7. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Only wants to block globally after not even three years editing knowing just English as a second languag? Over my dead body.  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  16:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
8. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shotgun pete (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  While Matiia has some good crosswiki experience, they are not an administrator on a content wiki. Adminship on a content wiki shows both engagement with and understanding of the purpose of Wikimedia, demonstrates a level of trust that a candidate will not abuse their rights in a content dispute and proves that they can work collaboratively with others on sometimes difficult and contentious areas.
   With that being said, there are a lot of steward tasks, there is a shortage of active stewards (and a weaker candidate pool), and they have shown the ability to use the global sysop flag without much controversy, so I can't really oppose here either. If elected, I hope that you proceed cautiously in areas where you do not feel experienced, especially in those related to policy or dealing with wikis that no longer follow Wikimedia principles. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
3. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Unknown Rogi 16:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
4. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
5. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rschen7754's comment sums up my views as well Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

      Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Predatorix (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

6. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]