Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patterns in multiple-choice tests

Patterns in multiple-choice tests

Patterns in multiple-choice tests (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Original research essay. Ridernyc 09:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as pure OR. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 10:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.Alberon 10:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - in this case, there would be no reason other than notability for anyone to make the unsourced article. It needs cleaning up, and sourcing, though. digitalemotion 11:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the two comments above the one above. I don't get the explanation about why this should be kept. It's notable because someone wrote an article? Mandsford 12:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unsourced, appears to violate WP:OR. Cogswobbletalk 14:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Totally goes against Wikipedia:No original research. Other than helping students cheat (will it really work?), there is no other use for this article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a cheating forum. --Zacharycrimsonwolf 15:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]