Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog analysis

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Verdatum (talk | contribs) at 21:53, 2 December 2007 (Blog analysis: typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Blog analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Original research essay with no sources. Ridernyc (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this could be sourced. For Example, a quick and dirty Google search yields this Ars Technica link: US military turns to "blog analysis" for intelligence. I say keep or redirect to Data mining.--TexasDex 21:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If you're analyzing blogs, you'll call it blog analysis. That doesn't make it a term or a field of study. WP:N WP:RS. This may very well become a common term in the future, but it doesn't appear to be ready for WP yet. -Verdatum 21:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]