Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group

Article was already speedily deleted, but I restored to seek community discussion. As of now, I have no opinion on the merits. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems notable on reading article, reliable sources. Mykej (talk) 17:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appropriate sources for the subject. How this could be thought an A7 escapes me entirely. DGG (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep HTML 5 and the WHATWG have received quite a bit of attention in the software industry, as one might imagine. JavaTenor (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources appear to be good, and the topic has reasonable notability. Tim Ross·^talk 23:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. The WHATWG is one of the most important behind-the-scenes players in what the web is going to look like over the next ten years. Is the deleting admin insane? --Polonius (talk) 23:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, this should have never been deleted in the first place (unless there's something I'm missing). RFerreira (talk) 05:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]