Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering with Management
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FrozenPurpleCube (talk | contribs) at 01:14, 11 March 2008 (changing old signature to new username as part of Vanish using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:14, 11 March 2008 by FrozenPurpleCube (talk | contribs) (changing old signature to new username as part of Vanish using AWB)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Engineering with Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article about non-notable program of study at Trinity College, Dublin. Article was initially WP:PROD'ed, author removed tag and somewhat improved article. Proposed merge with Trinity College article, which met with resistance from others that I'm inclined to agree with. - Fordan (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a program at the college, with no wider importance that leads to coverage in third-party sources. The appropriate ___location for this information is on their web pages, not Wikipedia. The college's article would best only briefly mention the general fields the institution offers degrees in, not the specific details. FrozenPurpleCube 21:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom not notable Harlowraman 04:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I do strongly agree with the above comments. This article should go for deletion. Niaz bd 10:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article does not assert any notability --NAHID 21:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep as it appears to be a unique program, which ought to be notable, but cites are desperately needed per WP:V. Bearian 13:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.