Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Fitindia

This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Discardpath (talk | contribs) at 14:15, 9 February 2020 (Voted no). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: en-3, hi-2, mr-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi all, I would like to offer my candidature for the Stewards position. I live in Mumbai, India. I have been a active user on English Wikipedia and I am a administrator on Commons since 5 October 2019. I speak English, Hindi and Marathi, I help out as a OTRS volunteer. Thank you for taking time out to look at my candidature.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Fitindia


  Yes

  1. Rowingbohe (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/My work) 14:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Eatcha (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  No

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Oppose. To go from 4 months of adminship to steward is not going to be a good transition. Also shows very little experience in steward areas to compensate so we basically have no idea what we're getting - and the answers as to what they would accomplish are not very convincing. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020  --𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 14:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Your statement doesn't even say why you run as a steward. MF-W 14:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   More experience, both at the local and global levels, should be attained before moving into the steward role. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   I think stewards should have a longer tenure in administration functions first. — xaosflux Talk 14:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   User:-revi/SEV; fails 3. — regards, Revi 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Sorry but I'm convinced by above comments. CptViraj (📧) 14:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Lack of experience in area. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Not enough crosswiki activity, also responses concern me a bit. Kostas20142 (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Per above --Uğurkenttalk 14:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Don't see you often enough in vandal fighting areas and I still don't quite know what you'll do as a steward. Minorax (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Not enough experience. Richardkiwi (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020  --Turkmen talk 14:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Steinsplitter (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Lacks experience in x-wiki affairs, answers to questions leave a lot to be desired and show a lack of self-awareness and I'm not sure they understand the role of Stewards. However, I appreciate their dedication to various projects. Praxidicae (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Try once the next year. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Sysop on Commons for only few months ago and the statement makes impossible to see if the candidate knows the role of steward. Érico (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   stwalkerster (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Herby talk thyme 16:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Does not explain what would do as a steward. Being "trusted" is not enough, experience is needed too. Esteban16 (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Not suitable. Trijnsteltalk 17:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Absolutely not for now. --Stïnger (会話) 18:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   --Mirer (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Needs more experience RhinosF1 (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Ankry (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Lack of experience. *Youngjin (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Lack of experience — per above Sintakso (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   per Rschen7754 Klaas `Z4␟` V22:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Masumrezarock100 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020     Oppose per Érico and the "non"-answers the candidate has given to the questions. Masum Reza📞 23:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Your answers weren't very good unfortunately, but I encourage you to continue working and try again later. Leaderboard (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Vermont (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Liuxinyu970226 (Verification pending)   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Armbrust (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. 1989 (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   1989 (talk) 04:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Feminist (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Feminist (talk) 07:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020   Agree about the unsatisfactory answers to questions. You don't need to be a steward to help the community. But please try again next time. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Daniel J Zhao (Verification pending)   Daniel J Zhao (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

  1. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   It might be too quickly since you have become sys-op on Commons for just 4 months. 5LZ 14:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   I am glad to see their candidacy, however, they are just too new to the global area. One of their recent global lock requests seems that they need more experience. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   I agree with Camouflaged Mirage, Xaosflux and Rschen7754. Fitindia does good work as a Commons administrator, and I appreciate their contributions there. Unfortunately, they are not experienced enough in crosswiki matters. I cannot endorse his application, but I don't want to oppose either. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   While my original comment stands, I also recognize that they have been doing a good work in general, so I am not that confident opposing. Should this fails, keep it up! Kostas20142 (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 片割れ靴下 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020   If you candidate in next year, I may vote for support. 片割れ靴下 (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   I think the candidate's language abilities can help fill a gap the stewards are lacking in a bit but there's nothing that would compel me to support an otherwise inexperienced candidate. Give it a few more years and I'd be happy to reconsider. Hiàn (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 05:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. AshokChakra (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ashok   Talk 09:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Sg7438 (talk) 09:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]