Jpgordon
Cleared 22:31, 20 July 2005 (UTC) -- check history for record.
Joosh conspiracy
Everything is evidence for that. ;-) Jayjg (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Just dropping a note to say thanks for cleaning up the vandalism on my user page: Thankyou. Rje 03:24, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for responding to RfC
To show more graphically the responses to the Ted Kennedy RfC, I created a tally with all the anons who've inserted the link or commented on it. Several of them have "contribution" records similar to the ones you noted. You probably don't need to bother doing that research, though. It's pretty obvious from the tally what's going on. JamesMLane 19:37, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
It was long overdue. PS if you feel my comments were worded inappropriately or intemperately, please revise them. I was rather disgusted when I wrote what I did, as well as when I wrote this, although I think it's an honest assessment of the ongoing nonsense... Also, you may have noticed the particular manner in which I archived will prevent reverting except by an admin. Also, you may or may not have noticed, User:Titus70AD has been adding more of his unbelievably long rambling comments to long-since archived discussions--clearly this guy has a LOT of time on his hands. Well, either that, or judging by this, an obsession. Tomer TALK 04:40, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
"visual effects"
Nice to see someone else not loath to speak. For panic, my drug of choice is an anti-convulsant. Glad to hear yours is under control. So is mine, usually. I'm afraid that person wanted something like seeing people's heads swell up to the size of watermelons, or doors shrinking and hallways lengthening. Cheers --Mothperson cocoon 13:38, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Vandalism of History of South Africa in the apartheid era went undetected.
Hi -- I just noticed that some wholesale vandalism of the History of South Africa in the apartheid era a couple of days ago went undetected until today. An anon replaced the entire text of the article with the old text of the Apartheid article, including the bit about "diaspora Jews." Since this seems to have slipped under everyone's radar (including mine), and I don't know who has History of South Africa in the apartheid era on their watchlist, I thought I'd give you a heads up. --Bcrowell 18:27, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
If you have a chance, would you mind taking a look at Slave trade? I believe that User:Heraclius has been involved in a determined attempt to POV the article. Jayjg (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Apartheid editor
Hi Josh. I've been putting the IPs in numerical order, so that we don't get any duplicates; do you think chronological would be better? Jayjg (talk) 17:06, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Well, the thing is, the two that you've added were already there... :-O Jayjg (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Insults, etc.
Josh, inviting you to contribute to this discussion of insults, etc. of public figures in the Village Pump patsw 01:58, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
I re-named the page; let me know what you think. The problem with the page name now is that it doesn't contain any reference to this editor's obsession with Jews. Jayjg (talk) 07:06, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
rename of {{delete}}
To make it clear, {{Delete}} would be left as a redirect. The only reason for the rename is so that ALL the speedy deletion templates can have names with the same prefix, so that they will group together in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. I am not trying to get rid of {{tl|delete} and it will still work exactly as before. it will just be a redirect to a name that matches all the other speedy deletion templates. Does that sound like the "same idea as before"? This was rquested by several admins working speedy patrol, so that all the deletion templates would group together, and my promise to do this was one factor in the recent decision to keep {{db-bio}}. That is the only reason for the proposed rename, it is not an attempt to do away with or deprecate {{delete}}. Does that clarify matters a bit? Please reconsider your comment on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Thank you. DES (talk) 23:14, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Ku Klux Klan article
Hi -- There's recently been a series of reverts to the Ku Klux Klan article concerning two separate issues: Robert Byrd, and the end of the first Klan. I have a feeling that there's been some confusion due to the fact that as the reverts were coming in hot and heavy, both parts of the article were getting reverted. It would be great if we could get a meaningful discussion going on the article's talk page about these issues.--Bcrowell 05:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Insulting Users
I was wondering, since you have been known to block users, how does a Wikipedian go about reporting someone who is constantly abusive to other Wikipedians when they point anything out to them? I'm currently thinking of the user User:Timewaster and the discussion on his talk page which he hasn't taken kindly to, but there are many other users out there who employ similar tactics. Ben W Bell 07:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
[copied from user page]
Hey JP, you are correct in saying that is a vile personal attack being part of a murder conspiracy, when a person goes around deleting the kempler video from every place I put it, including Rabin murder conspiracy, one has to wonder. I just wrote the Kempler video page and will probably delete it. Kempler Video (talk · contribs), copied from user page by me. — Knowledge Seeker দ 07:36, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Aposthia, and the comments by Sirkumsize. Jayjg (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
Adminship
Hi, JP. Just a quick note to say thanks for your kind words in response to Dbracey's suggestion about adminship for me a while back. So, thanks. :) Peace 2 u. deeceevoice 22:13, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
I'll stop
I just wanted to make sure some one would wikify this info.
I'll stop
I just wanted to make sure some one would wikify this info.
Looks like User:Petaholmes protected the article, locking in the pro-sleaze version. --Calton | Talk 02:13, August 18, 2005 (UTC)