Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argument from Time and Contingency
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PeterSymonds (talk | contribs) at 14:25, 12 June 2008 (→Argument from Time and Contingency: close). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 14:25, 12 June 2008 by PeterSymonds (talk | contribs) (→Argument from Time and Contingency: close)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#^12. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Argument from Time and Contingency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nothing more than an essay on one users beliefs. SGGH speak! 10:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article is pure original research and is currently PROD'ed as well. TN‑X-Man 11:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a probable copyright violation. The Terms of Service of that blog hosting site reads:
| “ | You or a third party licensor, as appropriate, retain all patent, trademark and copyright to any Content you submit, post or display on or through Google services and you are responsible for protecting those rights, as appropriate." Therefore, the author retains copyright of that blog. | ” |
- Tagging it with a G12 a few moments from now. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 13:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Whether or not this is a copyright problem - and I suspect it isn't really, because I suspect that it's been posted here by the blog writer or with that writer's permission - this still is redundant to cosmological argument, which is what this version of that old chestnut seems to be a slightly modified version of. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.