Meta:Requests for checkuser/Hasley

This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Sargento de Hierro (talk | contribs) at 15:53, 2 October 2021 (Hasley). It may differ significantly from the current version.

Not ending before 6 October 2021 05:45 (UTC)

Hello everyone, I am Hasley, and after a note of encouragement, I present myself as a candidate for checkusership.

Over more than 19 months of being elected sysop here, I have been one of the most active administrators, making up more than 18,000 edits, and logged over 9,000 admin actions.

As part of my duties, I deal with cross-wiki abusers, spambots, and sockpuppeters fairly often, and in many situations CU tools would benefit - see for example this case, in which I blocked 7 accounts until a steward had to do a local check, this one, and this another. I am applying for CheckUser in order to stop serial vandals, rather than playing an endless Whac-A-Mole game when blocking them. I expect to get involved at RFCU as well.

I do not hold CU rights elsewhere as I have no wish to become one there, and am not running on the basis that “we need more CheckUsers”, especially considering that Meta has a fairly small queue. However, I think I am qualified enough to fill the gap that sometimes exists, and would be a net-positive to the project.

I am over the age of 18, legal age in my place of residence, and already signed the confidentiality agreement. I am willing to answer any questions, if raised. Thank you for your consideration. Sgd. —Hasley 05:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support
  1.   Support Active and competent user. Thanks for all the work you do in combating disruption. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support Almost all of our Meta checkusers are active, but I have no reason to oppose an active and capable admin who is volunteer for this task. --Uncitoyentalk 07:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Strong support Of course, without a doubt. Thanks for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support wait, Hasley not a CU? Let's fix that. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 09:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support yes! --mirinano (talk) 11:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support Thanks for volunteering --MdsShakil (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support No concerns. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
    14:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support --Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 23:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support -- without doubt. --Daniuu (talk) 19:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support --Hulged (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support of course. JavaHurricane 14:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support -- 94rain Talk 20:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support -sasha- (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Sargento de Hierro (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Neutral