Meta:Requests for checkuser/Hasley
- Hasley (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.
Not ending before 13 October 2021 05:45 (UTC)
- Bureaucrat note: extended for one additional week. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello everyone, I am Hasley, and after a note of encouragement, I present myself as a candidate for checkusership.
Over more than 19 months of being elected sysop here, I have been one of the most active administrators, making up more than 18,000 edits, and logged over 9,000 admin actions.
As part of my duties, I deal with cross-wiki abusers, spambots, and sockpuppeters fairly often, and in many situations CU tools would benefit - see for example this case, in which I blocked 7 accounts until a steward had to do a local check, this one, and this another. I am applying for CheckUser in order to stop serial vandals, rather than playing an endless Whac-A-Mole game when blocking them. I expect to get involved at RFCU as well.
I do not hold CU rights elsewhere as I have no wish to become one there, and am not running on the basis that “we need more CheckUsers”, especially considering that Meta has a fairly small queue. However, I think I am qualified enough to fill the gap that sometimes exists, and would be a net-positive to the project.
I am over the age of 18, legal age in my place of residence, and already signed the confidentiality agreement. I am willing to answer any questions, if raised. Thank you for your consideration. Sgd. —Hasley 05:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support
- Support Active and competent user. Thanks for all the work you do in combating disruption. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Almost all of our Meta checkusers are active, but I have no reason to oppose an active and capable admin who is volunteer for this task. --Uncitoyentalk 07:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Of course, without a doubt. Thanks for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support wait, Hasley not a CU? Let's fix that. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 09:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support yes! --mirinano (talk) 11:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for volunteering --MdsShakil (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support No concerns. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC) - Support --Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 23:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- without doubt. --Daniuu (talk) 19:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Hulged (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support of course. JavaHurricane 14:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- 94rain Talk 20:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support -sasha- (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Sargento de Hierro (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support, a very helpful administrator here already. Will be able to help more with CU. --Ferien (talk) 14:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support MONUMENTA (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support a competent and active sysop. stanglavine msg 22:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support tkm — Lukecody (talk) 02:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Defender (talk) 02:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support, sure. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Absolutamente sí --LuchoCR (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 01:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Neutral