Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object detection and tracking in compressed ___domain
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by King of Hearts (talk | contribs) at 01:25, 28 October 2008 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:25, 28 October 2008 by King of Hearts (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Object detection and tracking in compressed ___domain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Is pure Original Research from a thesis, with no Notability yet. It proposes techniques that have yet to be shown in applications or as the subject of further research. Author has copied his own thesis into wiki, raising Conflict of interest issues. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete G12. Copyright infringement of http://lovebridge.org/wsyou/favorite.html. The creator had removed the speedy deletion tag. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but assertion on the talk page that he's the author and releasing into the public ___domain. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If that's the case, then it is still a delete as original research, and conflict of interest, since it appears to be the creator's own website. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've removed the G12 as it no longer applies. Stifle (talk) 18:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but assertion on the talk page that he's the author and releasing into the public ___domain. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note — if the user admits to being the copyright holder of the article, then the user has consequently admitted to having a conflict of interest with the subject. MuZemike (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Looking at the content as it is right now (looking past the copyvio issue), it violates WP:ESSAY. There is also an obvious conflict of interest with the article's creator as stated above. MuZemike (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a Copyright or COI, either one works. Tavix (talk) 23:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apparently the text has been released under a GFDL compatible license, so it's not a copyright issue. Conflict of interest does not necessarily require deletion. But the original text is original research, apparently proposing a method for detecting moving objects in compressed video streams. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR (COI is not in and of itself sufficient to delete, only a call for cleanup). --Orange Mike | Talk 13:30, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.