- ABC Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:Neologism and original research. No coverage in third-party reliable sources. Article was PRODed but declined. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 18:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Three guys named c0n, Guvna and Tony apparently talk like this. Someone thought that we would care. We don't. Mandsford (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
This is real language used by real people, hence why the language was documented. It's important to point out the original users and inventors of the language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ABC Language (talk • contribs) 18:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- Delete per WP:NFT Jclemens (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable per the various policies cited above in nom & Jclemens. A Google search throws up many hits for other uses of "ABC Language", but not this one. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
A Google search is not a valid point for an argument. Google is a search engine, not an encyclopedia. In this case ABC Language is related to a language that is unknown to some, but used a lot by others.