Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Forward Scripts
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jaxl (talk | contribs) at 00:09, 8 October 2005 (close - delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 00:09, 8 October 2005 by Jaxl (talk | contribs) (close - delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert 00:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
There's already a Fast Forward article. (Tagged for clean-up. I've cleaned up the introductory paragraphs, but there's a long, rambling, poorly written list of various sketches still there.) No need for a Fast Forward Scripts entry which would probably be a breach of copyright anyway. Delete CLW 11:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-encyclopedic, and a probable copyright violation. Delete. - Andre Engels 12:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clear issues with IP in addition to being unencyclopedic.--nixie 00:50, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Probably breaches copyright. Xtra 03:20, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ambi 05:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Fast Forward as examples of style of humour if not a breach of copyright, else delete as copyvio. --Scott Davis Talk 09:07, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Could be fair dealing if only a small amount is used and only as an example. Xtra 06:07, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.