Talk:Process window index
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Process window index article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||
| 1 |
 | Process window index is currently a Engineering good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 17:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Issues
Just minutes ago I found in this article a passage that read as follows:
![{\displaystyle {\text{PWI}}=100\times \max _{i=1\dots N \atop j=1\dots M}\left\{\left|{\frac {measured\_value_{[i,j]}-average\_limits_{[i,j]}}{range_{[i,j]}/2}}\right|\right\}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b3e78cc3294dcd2e9f9bbf1daf038ebce9e98b46)
Where:[1]
- i = 1 to N (number of thermocouples)
- j = 1 to M (number of statistics per thermocouple)
- measured_value [i,j] = the [i,j]th statistic's value
- average_limits [i,j] = the average of the [i,j]th high and low limits of the statistic
- range [i,j] = the [i,j]th high limit minus the low limit of the statistic
I changed it to say this:
![{\displaystyle {\text{PWI}}=100\times \max _{i=1\dots N \atop j=1\dots M}\left\{\left|{\frac {{\text{measured value}}_{[i,j]}-{\text{average limits}}_{[i,j]}}{{\text{range}}_{[i,j]}/2}}\right|\right\}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b52d18af2bdb9154fa92b6dca5617e14f70a6b11)
Where:[1]
- i = 1 to N (number of thermocouples)
- j = 1 to M (number of statistics per thermocouple)
- measured value [i, j] = the [i, j]th statistic's value
- average limits [i, j] = the average of the [i, j']th high and low limits of the statistic
- range [i, j] = the [i, j]th high limit minus the low limit of the statistic
One lesson is that whatever it takes to get nominated to be a "Good Article", it doesn't required much attention to standard Wikipedia style conventions. Then I corrected two links in the opening section in which every word began with an incorrectly capitalized initial letter.
So now I'm wondering: why does every word in the title phrase begin with a capital letter? Michael Hardy (talk) 04:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Michael, thank you for the fixes and article review. The text was in capitals because I had initially thought these were proper nouns – at least in some of the books I have with me, they were. Now that you mention it, I did verify them, and have changed these to lower case. Regards, Zithan (talk) 15:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello. When I said "the title phrase", I meant the phrase that is the title of the article: Process Window Index. Why do those three words have capital initial letters? Michael Hardy (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)