Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NLP concepts and methods

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Action potential (talk | contribs) at 11:04, 30 October 2005 (add todo list). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 19 years ago by Comaze in topic General Discussion

Welcome!

Agreed decisions (style, approach, etc)

  1. Articles which would fall under this project should have the template {{NLPproject}} added to their page at the top, letting readers know that there is a project and possibly style or content standards concerning that page.
  2. Pages that contain mixed NLP and non-NLP uses need consideration as to whether the subject matter warrants creating a separate NAME (NLP) article, if this might be helpful. (It won't always be appropriate, discuss here if unsure)

Articles involved and current status

Quick ideas: the following would probably be considered examples of tools which were either developed within, or built into the core of, classic NLP. It's not necessarily complete yet. The categorization is mine, for convenience:

Presuppositions
Models
Working methods and tools
Theoretical constructs
NLP Modeling
Original development group

Articles needing special attention or with major controversy

General Discussion

Literature (1972-1985)
  1. Structure of Magic Vol 1. 1975a (100 citations)
  2. Structure of Magic Vol 2. 1975b
  3. Frogs into Princes (Bandler & Grinder, 1979)
  4. Reframing (19XX)
  5. Unlimited Power (Robbins, 19XX)
  6. Patterns of Milton Erickson Vol.1 (1976)
  7. Patterns of Milton Erickson Vol.2 (1977)
  8. NLP Volume 1 (Dilts et al. 1980)
  9. Dilts, Roots of NLP (1983)
  10. Dilts, Applications of NLP (1985?)

Do you want to include the developers in this Project. Or limit it to the concepts and theory only? --Comaze 10:26, 30 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Standardise citations.
  1. I want to use standardised notation and citations throughout the entire project. The same style as in Structure of Magic Volume 1. --Comaze 10:30, 30 October 2005 (UTC)Reply