Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francophone Institute for Computer Science
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mailer diablo (talk | contribs) at 07:32, 3 November 2005 (→[[Francophone Institute for Computer Science]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 07:32, 3 November 2005 by Mailer diablo (talk | contribs) (→[[Francophone Institute for Computer Science]])
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 07:32, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I started to wikify this article until I realized that is was basically an ad. Although it is certainly possible to have an unbiased NPOV, non-advertisement, non-spam article on a university, this certainly isn't it. IMO, it needs to be either deleted or have all the text scrapped and entirely reworked. It is worth noting that as of right now, there are no pages that link to this page. --Bachrach44 16:54, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep This is tough, as it is definitely a bit advert-like. But, I'm hoping it's obscure enough to hang out for a bit, in hopes of a proper rewrite. Dxco 06:30, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is another article that has serious problems, but might be worth saving and referring to cleanup with an eye toward countering systemic bias toward predominantly anglophone places and topics. TECannon 15:05, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment article is an orphan.Geni 15:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep please we do not need to erase something to clean it really Yuckfoo 18:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Verifiable and will become a healthy part of wikipedia with a little (okay, a lot of) work. Helps address systemic bias. (I like yuckfoo's analogy, too.) :) Jacqui ★ 05:35, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.