Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACQ-Kingdom Broadcasting Network

ACQ-Kingdom Broadcasting Network, Inc.

POV rant. This is not an encyclopedia article. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:54, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep providing it is rewritten as a short NPOV article. -- RHaworth 06:17, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if rewritten. Delete if not. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:10, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It exists, but I see little evidence that it is notable (even if the article were NPOVd - which would leave a very small stub at present) Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 14:47, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Being a bad article is not a reason to deletion, but rather to improve. Trollderella 17:22, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Guy. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment 1; I have added the POV tag, in the unlikely event this article passes the AfD without ending up in meta:Archive table. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment 2; I remind everyone that we have deleted companies posting their ads here. I do not see how this one is different. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Removed earlier vote to keep as page is a copyvio. While it is a legitimate tpic for an article, it shouldn't be a copyvio one. Delete. Capitalistroadster 22:25, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Guy. Advertising of small business' is not encyclopediatic. KillerChihuahua 17:43, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if rewritten or turned into a stub. Delete otherwise. I was thinking it would be non-notable, but they were mentioned in the Manilla Times and repeatedly in their hometown paper, the Sun Star Davao, which appears to be an award-winning paper in a city of over one million. --William Pietri 18:29, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: that the local newspaper of the city only mentions this station five times is a sign of non-notability. The article of the Manila times mentions this station only at the end of the article, in passing. The sentence is particularly interesting:
    If you don’t believe religion is big business you don’t know how many millions of pesos evangelists and other “religious” leaders are spending to widen their communication network [1].
    I also think that even good newspapers sometimes mention things or people that are not notable. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 19:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmmmm... Looking into this more, it looks like this is one head of a hydra, but a notable hydra. If we had an article on Apollo C. Quiboloy or the Kingdom of Jesus Christ the Name Above Every Name church, I'd support a merge. But as it is I'm not quite sure what to do. --William Pietri 20:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hopelessly PoV, probably nn FRS 21:02, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The list of TV channels alone is significant, just remove the POV stuff and clean it up. Bryan 04:27, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]