Meta:Requests for adminship/QuentinvBot

QuentinvBot

Ending 7 October 2011 19:22 UTC

• QuentinvBot (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hello. I will, on the advise of Trijnstel, move my archive scripts on a separate account. But, as it needs to edit the page Steward requests/Permissions/Approved temporary, it should be able to edit protected pages.

I don't know if it should have the bot status, because it won't flood the RCs but a bot with sysop rights is far more dangerous. Feel free to give your opinion on this discussion too. Thanks. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 19:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

•   Support. As I told you on IRC, I would prefer if this account wouldn´t have a bot flag so everyone can see what the bot is doing. --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•   Support sysop flag and permission to run, but   Oppose bot flag. Low activity admin bot,so it would be better if we all can keep an eye on its activities. Also, as a matter of standard procedure for these things, what is the bot's behaviour if someone blocks it? Courcelles 20:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Support the sysop, oppose the bot, per Courcelles. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•   Support admin {{oppose} bot, unneeded fr33kman 20:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]