Zero-forcing precoding

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 220.88.15.147 (talk) at 00:58, 20 June 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Zero-forcing (or Null-Steering) precoding is a spatial signal processing by which the multiple antenna transmitter can null multiuser interference signals in wireless communications. Regularized zero-forcing precoding is enhanced processing to consider the impact on a background noise and unknown user interference[1], where the background noise and the unknown user interference can be emphasized in the result of (known) interference signal nulling.

In particular, Null-Steering is a method of beamforming for narrowband signals where we want to have a simple way of compensating delays of receiving signals from a specific source at different elements of the antenna array. In general to make use of the antenna arrays, we better to sum and average the signals coming to different elements, but this is only possible when delays are equal. Otherwise we first need to compensate the delays and then to sum them up. To reach this goal, we may only add the weighted version of the signals with appropriate weight values. We do this in such a way that the frequency ___domain output of this weighted sum produces a zero result. This method is called null steering. The generated weights are of course related to each other and this relation is a function of delay and central working frequency of the source.


Performance of Zero-forcing Precoding

If the transmitter knows the downlink channel state information (CSI) perfectly, ZF-precoding can achieve almost the system capacity when the number of users is large. On the other hand, with limited channel state information at the transmitter (CSIT) the performance of ZF-precoding decreases depending on the accuracy of CSIT. ZF-precoding requires the significant feedback overhead with respect to signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) so as to achieve the full multiplexing gain[2]. Inaccurate CSIT results in the significant throughput loss because of residual multiuser interferences. Multiuser interferences remain since they can not be nulled with beams generated by imperfect CSIT.

Mathematical Description

In multiple antenna downlink systems which comprises a   transmit antenna access point (AP) and   single receive antenna users, the received signal of user   is described as

 

where   is the   vector of transmitted symbols,   is the noise signal,   is the   channel vector and   is the   linear precoding vector. From the fact that each Beam generated by ZF-precoding is orthogonal to all the other user channel vectors, we can rewrite the received signal as

 

For comparison purpose, we describe the received signal model for multiple antenna uplink systems. In the uplink system with a   receiver antenna AP and   K single transmit antenna user, the received signal at the AP is described as

 

where   is the transmitted signal of user  ,   is the   noise vector,   is the   channel vector.

See Also

References

  1. ^ B. C. B. Peel, B. M. Hochwald, and A. L. Swindlehurst (Jan. 2005). "A vector-perturbation technique for near-capacity multiantenna multiuser communication - Part I: channel inversion and regularization". IEEE Trans. Commun. 53: 195–202. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2004.840638. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ N. Jindal (Nov. 2006). "MIMO Broadcast Channels with Finite Rate Feedback". IEEE Trans. Information Theory. 52 (11): 5045–5059. doi:10.1109/TIT.2006.883550. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)