Help:IPA/Conventions for English

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kwamikagami (talk | contribs) at 09:05, 7 August 2009 (Consonants). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The various English dictionaries use different and sometimes conflicting IPA transcriptions for English. For example, the transcription /i/ may be used for the vowel of sit, of seat, or at the end of city. A dictionary may not even be consistent between one edition and the next. This table correlates the more widely used dictionaries with the conventions of the WP:IPA for English key that is used on Wikipedia.

Most dictionaries transcribe a specific dialect or accent, such as the Received Pronunciation (RP) of the Oxford English Dictionary, or a narrow range of dialects. Wikipedia's WP:IPA for English key, on the other hand, is intended to cover both RP and General American. As such, Wikipedia transcribes /r/ where it is found in rhotic dialects, but also the vowel distinctions found in non-rhotic dialects, without separating distinct UK and US pronunciations. Specific dialects may also be transcribed—local pronunciations of place names are often useful, for example—but they are normally written in addition to a more universal pronunciation.

When entering IPA in an article, please use the {{IPA}} template so that it is formatted properly on all web browsers. /Slashes/ and [brackets] should be included inside the IPA template, so that they display in the same font as the IPA itself. Also, please use proper stress ˈ and length ː marks (available at the bottom of your edit window) rather than the non-IPA shortcuts of apostrophe ' and colon :. Depending on the reader's font preferences, the latter can be ambiguous.

For a list of those languages other than English which have agreed-upon transcriptions in Wikipedia, see {{IPAhelp}}. For a comparison of the non-IPA transcriptions found in many US dictionaries, see Pronunciation respelling for English.

Alternate pronunciations

When dictionaries give alternate pronunciations, they may mean that people disagree. For example, some people pronounce bath /ˈbæθ/, with the vowel of bat, while others with the same accent pronounce it /ˈbɑːθ/, with the vowel of bra. This is the kind of difference celebrated in "You like to-MAY-toes and I like to-MAH-toes". On Wikipedia, we would normally need to transcribe both, unless only one is considered correct, as may be the case for personal and place names.

However, often variant transcriptions reflect distinctions between accents, and these we do not need to transcribe, since our IPA key already covers such distinctions. For example, dictionary.com transcribes horse as "/hɔrs/" and hoarse as "/hɔrs, hoʊrs/". This is meant to show that some people pronounce hoarse the same as horse; it does not mean that there are two pronunciations of hoarse among those who make the distinction. (See horse-hoarse merger.) It would not be possible to have the song lyric "You say hoarse and I say horse", because only those people who say hoarse would be able to sing it. And indeed in the OED there is only one pronunciation for each: horse (hɔːs) and hoarse (hɔəs). Therefore on Wikipedia we would only have one transcription per word, and the distinct pronunciation would suffice: horse /ˈhɔrs/, hoarse /ˈhɔərs/. Since the IPA key defines the conventions /ɔr/ and /ɔər/ according to basic English words, readers who do not make the distinction will see them as being equivalent, much as the spelling pronunciations YOU-clid and EWE-clid for "Euclid" would be seen as equivalent.

Consonants

Consonants vary little between dictionaries. The ones which do are those which start the words:

rich, /r ~ ɹ ~ (r) ~ (ɹ)/;
which, ~ hw ~ (h)w ~ w/;
and new, /njuː ~ nuː/.

Wikipedia editors have decided to go with /ˈrɪtʃ/, /ˈhwɪtʃ/, /njuː/ for these words.

Vowels

In non-rhotic accents such as RP, /r/ not pronounced unless followed by a vowel. In Wikipedia articles, /ɪər/ etc. are not always distinguished from /ɪr/ etc. When they are, the long vowels may be transcribed /iːr/ etc. by analogy with vowels not followed by /r/.

WP OED2 OED3
(UK)
OED3
(US)
SOED K&K dict COD Mac
æ æ a æ
ær ær ɛr
ʌɪ
aɪr
aɪ.ər
aɪər, aɪə(r)
aʊr
aʊ.ər
aʊər, aʊə(r)
ɑː ɑː ɑː ɑ
ɑr ɑː, ɑː(r) ɑː ɑr
ɒ ɒ ɒ ɑ
ɒr ɒr ɔr
ɛ ɛ ɛ ɛ
ɛr ɛr ɛr
ɛər ɛə, ɛə(r) ɛː ɛ(ə)r
ɜr ɜː, ɜː(r) əː ər
i
ɪ ɪ ɪ ɪ
ɪr ɪr
ɪər ɪə, ɪə(r) ɪə ɪ(ə)r
əʊ əʊ
ɔː ɔː ɔː ɔ
ɔr ɔː, ɔː(r) ɔː ɔr
ɔər ɔə, ɔə(r) ɔː ɔ(ə)r
ɔɪ ɔɪ ɔɪ ɔɪ
u
ʊ ʊ ʊ ʊ
ʊər ʊə, ʊə(r) ʊə ʊ(ə)r
ʌ ʌ ʌ ə
ʌr ʌr ʌr
juː[1] juː
Reduced vowels
ə ə ə ə
ən (ə)n ən
əm (ə)m əm
əl (ə)l əl
ər ə, ə(r) ə ər
i ɪ i i
ɨ ɪ ɪ ə
ɵ ə(ʊ)
ʊ ʊ ʊ
WP OED2 OED3
(UK)
OED3
(US)
SOED K&K dict COD Mac

Stress

One-syllable words may have stress. Most dictionaries leave it out, but that can be confusing when several such words are strung together. For example, in the name Zack de la Rocha, Zack and Rocha have stress, but de la does not. It would therefore convey an incorrect pronunciation to leave the stress mark off Zack: /ˈzæk dɛlə ˈroʊtʃə/.

OED2 does not indicate stress on monosyllables, but uses the stress mark two disambiguate disyllables: higher (ˈhaɪə(r)) vs. hire (haɪə(r)). On WP, the distinction is made with the aid of the syllabicity mark: /ˈhaɪ.ər/, /ˈhaɪr/.

Dictionaries also disagree on secondary stress. Generally, any stressed syllable prior to the last is marked as secondary (/ˌzæk dɛlə ˈroʊtʃə/), and that convention is followed here. However, several dictionaries also mark full (unreduced) vowels as having secondary stress when they come after the primary stress, even though they are not actually stressed. This practice is avoided on Wikipedia; if you have a word transcribed /ˈCVˌCV/, it should probably be /ˈCVCV/.

  1. ^ In many dialects, /juː/ is pronounced the same as /uː/ after "tongue sounds" (/t/, /d/, /s/, /z/, /n/, /θ/, and /l/) in the same syllable, so that dew /djuː/ is pronounced the same as do /duː/.