Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Archive/Feb 2010
Stale
Resolved
Starfleet insignia
Resolved-
Original
-
Transparent
Article(s): Starfleet insignia
Request: please remove black background... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 04:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): OW. I'm not good at all, but I'm not able to get a clean result. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 18:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Done Kim UKRefugee (talk) 21:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Uhm, sorry about overwriting your version, UKRefugee, that was not my intention, I just happened to finish it right after you did. Anyway, I think my version without indexed colors looks a bit more cleaner. I also added a bit more shadows to it (they might look a bit odd, though). Anyway, revert to UKRefugee's version if you prefer his/her version, Kintetsubuffalo. —Quibik (talk) 21:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Both are great, this is a toughie. Since Wiki is headed toward png, I think that will sway me here. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Brazil needs to be painted
Resolved-
World Map
Article(s): Pornography_by_region
Request: Pint Brazil green Gecg (talk) 03:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC) It was already requested in the talk page. You can see it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pornography_by_region#Porno_map_is_having_many_errors.2C_please_correct And it is truth because i live in Brazil, hardcore pornography is widely sold in public places and can be bought and rented in dvd shops. It says that other countries allow too, but i can only speak for my.
Graphist opinion(s): 
Request taken by DMS. -- DMS (talk) 07:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Done : Brazil painted green as requested. -- DMS (talk) 07:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Great Work!! Thank you, it's perfect! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gecg (talk • contribs) 18:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Casablanca Conference
Resolved-
Churchill and Roosevelt at the Casablana Conference in 1943.
Article(s): Casablanca Conference
Request: Hi, would it be possible to restore the quality of this image? Currently it looks very overexposed, and it needs to be darkened to increase the level of detail that can be seen. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): I've had a look at the image, and I don't think it's possible to do what you're asking for, I'm afraid. The information simply isn't there in the image to bring out by reducing the brightness and/or contrast. I'm sorry. -- DMS (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ah ok, pity. Maybe a better version of the image exists somewhere. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- I have uploaded the original from the source given, which is slightly better than what was in Commons. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- I reduced the midtone contrast by quite a bit (from Secwaltz'), saves some but brings up other problems. Histogram looks better now. Jpeg editing is no fun anyway.. Martinor (talk) 07:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- I edited out the lines of different lightness from the image and further tweaked the histogram a bit. —Quibik (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's quite an improvement to the image. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 16:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- I edited out the lines of different lightness from the image and further tweaked the histogram a bit. —Quibik (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- I reduced the midtone contrast by quite a bit (from Secwaltz'), saves some but brings up other problems. Histogram looks better now. Jpeg editing is no fun anyway.. Martinor (talk) 07:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- I have uploaded the original from the source given, which is slightly better than what was in Commons. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ah ok, pity. Maybe a better version of the image exists somewhere. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)