Steward requests/Checkuser

Shortcut:
SRCU

Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}: Confirmed	{{MoreInfo}}: Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely	{{Deferred}}: Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible	{{Completed}}: Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely	{{TakeNote}}: Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated	{{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive	{{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined	{{Fishing}}: CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: CheckUser is not magic pixie dust	{{8ball}}: The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}: It looks like a duck to me	{{Crystalball}}: CheckUser is not a crystal ball

<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>

<translate> Before making a request:</translate>

<translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
<translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
<translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
- Wikimedia: meta • commons • species • data
- Wikipedia: ar • bn • ca • cs • da • de • en • es • fa • fi • fr • he • hu • id • it • ja • ko • ml • nl • pl • pt • ru • simple • sl • sr • sv • th • tr • uk • vi • zh
- Wikibooks: en
- Wikinews: en
- Wiktionary: en
<translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>

<translate> How to make a request</translate>

<translate> How to make a request:</translate>

<translate> Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also [[<tvar name="Srcu">Template:Srcu/doc#Usage</tvar>|<tvar name="Srcu2">{{srcu}}</tvar> help]]).</translate>

=== Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate nowrap><!--T:11--> [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate nowrap><!--T:12--> Reasons here</translate>. ~~~~
}}

<translate> For example:</translate>

=== Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate nowrap><!--T:14--> [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate nowrap><!--T:15--> Reasons here.</translate> ~~~~
}}

<translate> Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.</translate>

Cross-wiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ usurpation requests Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Email blacklisting
Meta-Wiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Requests for help

Requests

Caroline Rossini@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Caroline Rossini (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Peveratt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Suspeito que Caroline Rossini e Peveratt são mesmas pessoas. Eles editam sempre no mesmo local das discussões dos wikipedistas (citados no "discussion"): páginas em votação, propostas e principalmente às respostas suspeitas aos usuários nas discussões. Ao consultar o histórico das edições, editaram, achei algumas inconsistências, a mais recente é de (22 de fevereiro) e horários semelhantes. Vejam abaixo (em português).
Translate to English: I suspect that Caroline Rossini and Peveratt are the same people. They edit in the same place in discussions of Wikipedians (cited in "discussion") pages on the ballot proposals and especially the responses to suspicious users in discussions. When you see the history of the editions, edited, I found some inconsistencies, is the latest (February 22) and a similar time. See below (in Portuguese).

Peveratt: 14h46min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos
Caroline Rossini: 14h33min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (Mais uma conta adormecida)
Peveratt: 14h03min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Cidreira (Rio Grande do Sul)
Caroline Rossini: 13h24min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Usuário(a) Discussão:189.111.22.222; 13h20min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Usuária:Caroline Rossini ? (última alteração)
Peveratt: 12h53min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Cidreira (Rio Grande do Sul); 12h47min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos; 12h46min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos; 12h42min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (nova se(c)ção: Incluir "(desambiguação)" não é vandalismo); 12h39min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos; 12h38min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos
Caroline Rossini: 06h07min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 N Usuário(a) Discussão:189.117.206.208 (nova página: {{subst:bv-av|Não Empurra Que É Pior}} ~~~~) (última alteração); 06h00min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Trem Urbano de Lima (Desfeita a edição 29022001 de 190.232.245.219 s-fontes) (última alteração); 06h00min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Trem Urbano de Lima (Desfeita a edição 29022019 de 190.232.245.219); 05h55min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 N Usuário(a) Discussão:186.196.176.26 (nova página: {{subst:bv-av|Escândalo da Administração da Roseana Sarney}} ~~~~) (última alteração); 03h33min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 N Usuário(a) Discussão:177.113.166.98 (nova página: {{subst:bv-av|Meredith Bergmann}} ~~~~) (última alteração); 03h09min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Usuário(a) Discussão:177.83.67.12 (última alteração); 02h58min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (Mais uma conta adormecida); 02h51min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio (Polyethylen); 02h50min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio
Peveratt: 02h49min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 m Cidreira (moveu Cidreira para Cidreira (desambiguação): Existe São Paulo (desambiguação) Nirvana (desambiguação) Nova Iorque (desambiguação) e outras Se é assim esse artigo também pode ser Cidreira (desambiguação) Pois a Cidade de Cidreira...)
Caroline Rossini: 02h42min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (Mais uma conta adormecida)
Peveratt: 02h32min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Cidreira (Rio Grande do Sul)

Uma curiosidade: a conta Caroline Rossini é a mais antiga e Peveratt foi criada recentemente e ainda se passa por IPs.
Translate to English: A curiosity: the account Caroline Rossini is the oldest and Peveratt was created recently and still goes on IPs. Bruno Leonard (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed:

Caroline Rossini
John Alan Alves da Silva
Cyphorhinus Uradus
Jorge Luiz Thais Martins
O Mestre P-Sião
Wet12
Caroline Rossini
Rubber Ducky
Tomate Atômico
Draftholds
Hum Milhão
Katzeirms
São Silvestre
Cachorro Louco
Pepita Negra
WikiLord
Semiramis Marx
J.Cajuru
Gerson Nunes Pereira
Thulsa Subotai
Tomate Atômico
Pé Espalhado
Ilha de Vera Cruz
Veloster

Unrelated: Peveratt

--Shizhao (talk) 07:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great, it was almost the cluster I found some days ago and I had no time to fulfill an investigation. --Vituzzu (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu, fiz essa mesma pergunta aqui, e a discussão foi arquivada. Depois que ocorreu verificação, aconteceu grande efeito: votações de páginas para exclusão tiveram resultados modificados e que alguns desses usuários tiveram estatuto de reversor e auto-reversor removidos. Quando for no dia 1º de março, vou colocar outra verificação pra você.
Translate to English: Vituzzu, made this same question here, and the discussion has been archived. After checking what happened, great effect happened: votes for deletion page results had changed and that some of these users had auto-reverser and reverser status' removed. When the March 1, I'll put another check for you. Bruno Leonard (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser is not for fishing??????????????????? Caroline Rossini (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alguém pode bloquear a conta Caroline Rossini e entre outras verificadas no Meta???
Translate to English: Someone can lock the account and Caroline Rossini and others checked in Meta? Bruno Leonard (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

胡雪岩之思@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 胡雪岩之思 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 纯纯夏子 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 天外飞仙子 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Those users continue attempting to remove AfD templates for zh:王宏佳, zh:张雨乔 and zh:道晖芝, which looks like trying to bypass 3RR limits. Mys_721tx(talk) 00:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fr33kman 01:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Karyne Lira Dias@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Karyne Lira Dias (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); WikiGT (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jancen sergio (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Duduzimm (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kascyo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): After the result of this check one more account revealed itself, so it's possible that there's more socks out there. The other four raised suspicion due to edit patterns similar to Caroline Rossini, mainly on Articles for Deletion. --viniciusmc (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Related requests:

--viniciusmc (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed

group1: Kascyo, Thallison Keiton
group2: Duduzimm, KIBCRU
group3: WikiGT, Mareshenrique
group4: PolyDisneyeNick,Jancen sergio

Possible: group1, group2, group3, group4, Karyne Lira Dias, after the result of check

--Shizhao (talk) 07:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hy Shizhao! At ptwiki, we're having a little bit of trouble trying to guess what that "Possible" means and, 'cause of it, we'd like to have some expert opinion. Those users you listed in paired groups should be considered as related to Karyne (and, through her, to the enormous sock farm you guys just uncovered) or as innocent bystanders to be proven guilty by a thorough behavioral analysys? Thx for the help. José Luiz ^talk 01:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From a technical point, these users is

Possible. These users use lot of dynamic IP, each group to use a different IP range, UAs is a small part of the same--Shizhao (talk) 01:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UAs? José Luiz ^talk 02:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon, Shizhao, but perhaps I did not make myself clear before: What do you mean by "UAs is a small part of the same"? Thanks again. José Luiz ^talk 23:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UA => UserAgent--Shizhao (talk) 01:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guru2001@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Guru2001 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Al Lemos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Emerson Almeida (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Luizpuodzius (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Peacekeeper (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tigre do oeste (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dominator (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dornicke (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:pt:Discussão:A Privataria Tucana, w:pt:Discussão:Governo Lula, w:pt:Discussão:Partido da Imprensa Golpista and others

Reason(s): Guru2001 is currently eternal blocked for consistent edit war, original research, POV and personal attack. Other accounts edit similarly, in similar articles, they are used to force his point of view. Guru2001 is dodging his eternal punishment. Note that some accounts very little editing, some were one year without issue and suddenly return policy on items of interest to the user, to support the likely another account of himself. 189.106.34.16 20:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to do an addendum: all these accounts above are disruptive. Attempt to subvert the system of Wikipedia, try to put data with non-reliable sources, they try to discredit reliable sources as not to be. Prevent other editors move in the articles, watch for anyone tamper with their version of the article. They fight with everyone, never come into consensus, always cause problems. 186.205.20.49 00:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please log in to request checkuser. MBisanz ^talk 00:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I request this request be done on behalf of the Ip. Tough I think some accounts are not related with each other, (Dornicke and Luizpuodzius seem to be different people) there is certainly enough evidence to do the check. (and there is no way to know without a check if one of them is related to Guru). Chico (talk) 00:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guru2001 & Peacekeeper are

Stale

Al Lemos, Emerson Almeida, Dornicke, and Luizpuodzius are

Unrelated

Dominator

Possible match to Genaron

Tigre do oeste

Possible match to Jazzista, Artjodo, and Jebelmir

Waiting for second review given my new experience. MBisanz ^talk 01:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks okay from my side. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 03:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm all the possible interconnections between these users. 189.106.124.34 12:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record: the IP who requested this check has been blocked dozens of times of editing in the Portuguese Wikipedia for vandalism, uncivil behavior, etc. He became such a a problem that a proposal of insight block for this IP has been made [1], with large support from the community, including administrators. He also has made a death threat against me [2]. Dornicke (talk) 06:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Rightpeople (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Specialgood (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Puppets,zh:User talk:Rightpeople

Reason(s): To prevent further edit disputes and restore normal editing. The users concerned participated in edit disputes concerning TV articles. Puppets may be created to evade three-revert rule (3RR). --Gakmo (talk) 01:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated fr33kman 01:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kuailong@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Kuailong (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Youssarin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:wp:AIV

Reason(s): Youssarin added many blog information to the article to destroy the article, and Kuailong did the same thing, Youssarin is suspected to be puppet of Kuailong, so they should be checked. thank you :) --Pangyanice (talk) 11:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is current practice that requests have to be made by registered users, please log in. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 11:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kuailong is a long term contributor who happened to do the same thing in a edit/reverting war on one article. No other overlap besides edits on that particular article. Bencmq (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is not only a edit/reverting war,but also a serious Vandalism， because what they added was huge blog information, just like advertisements. --Pangyanice (talk) 21:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any reason to CU anybody in this case. Ruslik (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jancen sergio@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Jancen sergio (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lacerda Bhahia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Chucknurres (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 31Julho1985 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Joaquim C. Sousa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); CAPGIGANTE (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jonathan Baltazar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jolielegal (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vini Santilou (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); WikiGT (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado

Reason(s): Solicito verificação completa de todas as contas citadas por entender que há forte suspeita que sejam mesmos usuários, como ocorreu em recentes revelações das duas checagens de fevereiro de 2012. Todos os usuários editam sobre assuntos sobre a Cidade de Curitiba (desde bairros até clubes de futebol). Antes, eu achava que Lacerda Bhahia era responsável pela criação das contas, mas sugiu de quem começou foi Jancen sergio. Sugiro também verificação de grupo de usuários bloqueados ou não, se tem alguma ligação:
Translate to English: Request full verification of all accounts listed on the understanding that there is strong suspicion that they are users, as occurred in recent revelations of the two checks in February 2012. All users edit on matters about the City of Curitiba (from neighborhoods to football clubs). Before, I thought Lacerda Bhahia was responsible for creating the accounts, but who came Jancen sergio was started. I also suggest checking user group blocked or not, if you have any link:

Caroline Rossini (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
WikiLord ([[

Special:Contributions/WikiLord|contr]] · [[

Special:DeletedContributions/WikiLord|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Pepita Negra (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Veloster (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Maranhense (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Xaxa2009 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Davidescorpiao (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Gustavo neto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Bruno-ban (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
R.ANDRETTA (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Umberto Bottura (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Luizpsouza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Luizpuodzius (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
LuizM (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Cruzados Sulistas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Katzeirms (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Márcia da Silva Katzeir (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lacerdão da Bahia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mar França (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Bruno Leonard (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inclua outro (Translate to English: Add another): Camtasia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). Bruno Leonard (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@stew, please read the advice I left on section below...” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 20:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per Teles. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 20:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

186.205.20.49@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: 186.205.20.49 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Emerson Almeida (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Luizpuodzius (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dornicke (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Peacekeeper (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tigre do oeste (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Al Lemos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dominator (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); DanteCan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado

Reason(s): Solicito verificação completa de todas as contas citadas, após suspeita postada pelo IP na minha discussão por entender que há forte suspeita que este IP tenha envolvimento nesses usuários, que por vez tenha alguma ligação deles no Rio de Janeiro.
Translate to English: Request full verification of all accounts listed after suspected posted by IP in my discussion to understand that there is strong suspicion that this IP has involvement in these users, which in turn has a link of them in Rio de Janeiro. Bruno Leonard (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I really recommend to the steward that read this request to do not accept it. Not enough reason to check was shown here IMO. It is just fishing.” T_ele^s (Talk) ███ 16:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As Teles said above, you did not gave any valid reason to check these accounts. Plus I doubt that somebody here is ready to establish a link between the accounts of contributors and the IP they used. Please remember that

CheckUser is not for fishing. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 19:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

189.106.124.34@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: 189.106.124.34 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 186.205.20.49 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Bruno Leonard and Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado

Reason(s): Solicito verificação completa de IPs citados, após suspeita postada pelo IP na minha discussão por entender que há forte suspeita que este IP tenha envolvimento nesses usuários, que por vez tenha alguma ligação de usuários do Rio de Janeiro:
Translate to English: Request full verification IPs cited after suspected posted by IP in my discussion to understand that there is strong suspicion that this IP has involvement in these users, which in turn has a link users of Rio de Janeiro:

189.106.124.34 Utrace e/and Tool Server
186.205.20.49 Utrace e/and Tool Server

Bruno Leonard (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend the same as Teles in another request (above), and i'd also recommend to ignore all requests from this user from now on. Just my two cents. CasteloBranco^msg 18:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per above. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 19:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thongkaka

Status: Done

Thongkaka28 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Thongkaka50 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Trijnstel has recently CU'ed some accounts on MediaWiki.org, and locked Thongkaka28, Thongkaka27, Thongkaka26 and Thongkaka45. Today, Thongkaka50 spammed on that project. Please consider checking that account and blocking its underlying IP (perhaps globally). Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 10:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done blocked in MWW. --Jyothis (talk) 12:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As an addition to this, I globally locked all known Thongkaka* accounts + some other confirmed socks. I can't globally block an IP address or range. Please keep reporting any new Thongkaka accounts. Thanks in advance for your effort! Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A new account: Thongkaka52 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). Mathonius (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Vituzzu (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quintinense@commons and pt.wikipedia

Status: In progress

List of users: Rcandre (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Higor Douglas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); DiegoAlvesBarbosa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Marcus Luccas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Raimundo57br (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Deletista (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Carnatiba (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sambalagoas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Keptauto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Carnaval9 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): All are being discussed as possibly being socks/meatpuppets of Quintinense. Marcus Luccas is his latest sock that survived for a long time. Higor Douglas is a confirmed (and confessed) meatpuppet of Quintinense. All others (besides the suspected) are confirmed recent sock with just a few edits. Please also include commons:User:Quintinense in the check, as he has recent and more numerous edits there. Also, beware of past checks indicating possible or inconclusive results for some of these accounts Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-01#Higor Douglas@pt.wikipedia, Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-01#Raimundo57br@pt.wikipedia Chico (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC) (edited for spelling)[reply]

The following, most mentioned, some not, are Confirmed to be the same user: Deletista, Carnatiba, Keptauto, Sambalagoas, Sepmreavanteuimpério, Vembaixada, Loggosul, Carnaval9
Comparison between the abovementioned complex and the other five users mentioned, and to those five amongst themselves does not lead to anything conclusive. Most of the pairs would be Unlikely based on back-and-forth jumping of ip addresses (might still be the same person on different devices of course). I'll go after the Commons CU later, if someone else would like to do that, be my guest though. This has already taken much more time than I was planning to spend :-( - Andre Engels (talk) 15:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArikamaI@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: ArikamaI (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 繁花落葉 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Naiveandsilly (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Miroir (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Puppet,zh:User talk:ArikamaI

Reason(s): To prevent further edit disputes and restore normal editing. The users concerned participated in edit disputes concerning TV articles. Puppets may be created to evade three-revert rule (3RR). --Rightpeople (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you could write your own reasons and not copy and paste exactly from User:Gakmo's request (the one about you) above. Bencmq (talk) 04:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

because this is a same problem, but those users continue attempting to remove link and information, eg: zh:點解阿Sir係阿Sir, zh:名媛望族etc.....therefore I need your help,thanks!--Rightpeople (talk) 04:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done at this time. A revert war is not a reason to run checkuser. If there is evidence of sock puppets, then the admins should bring that issue forward. This is a local issue and there are plenty of admins available to sort this out at zhwiki. billinghurst sDrewth 18:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Onetseneed@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Onesetneed (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Angleasked (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Uponhelpdd (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Limitsouls (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Moneygiven (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:WP:LTA/KellyMok

Reason(s): Based on the contributions these users made, they are most likely sockpuppets of KellyMok. See the enormous amount of users this person created for vandalism: w:zh:User:Miroir/TVB項目破壞者 (over 200!), and previous requests including: Citedcloud@zh.wikipedia, Turereporter@zh.wikipedia2, Turereporter@zh.wikipedia, Yeungtezman@zhwiki etc. If they are confirmed to be sockpuppets of KellyMok, please block them immediately. Is it possible to create a bot to automatically undo all the edits by the sockpuppets (since the edits done by all the hundreds of accounts are almost all the same)? Miroir (talk) 12:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that Onesetneed, Angleasked, Uponhelpdd, Limitsouls, Moneygiven are all at two IPs, and would be considered associated. To note that there are also significant numbers of other blocked accounts at these IP addresses. I will leave these accounts to your management. Other stewards have already taken action against the IP addresses though I have tightened the block due to the existing circumventions. billinghurst sDrewth 13:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that the request says to block confirmed accounts, now done. billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, billinghurst!! --Miroir (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Arthur Chevailier (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jordan Michael (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:pt:Jardins do Museu de York, w:pt:Estátua Bassetki

Reason(s): The user Chevailier Arthur created the page and after the lock is editing the Michael Jordan with the same pattern. Michael Jordan is blocked by default behavior, but would like a confirmation.Érico Júnior Wouters (talk) 21:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- - The following accounts are Confirmed to be related to each other:
    Jordan Michael (already blocked)
    
    Arthur Chevailier (already blocked)
    
    Olávio Teixeira (already blocked)
    
    Frodo Bolseiro
    
    Pararatibum
    
    Cinthia gabrielle0
    
    Peregrin blocked
    
    Carl Carvalho
    
    Willer Mack (already blocked)
    
    Paulo salomao
    
    Liragabriel
    
    Legal Fiel
    
    Bilau6
    
    Bilau5 (already blocked)
    
    Evil land
    
    Olhares Daqui pra Nos
    
    Kamilaaah
    
    Arthur Fontaine (already blocked)
    
    Robert77
  - --Bencmq (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Checkuser

Contents

Requests

Caroline Rossini@pt.wikipedia

胡雪岩之思@zh.wikipedia

Karyne Lira Dias@pt.wikipedia

Guru2001@pt.wikipedia

Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia

Kuailong@zh.wikipedia

Jancen sergio@pt.wikipedia

186.205.20.49@pt.wikipedia

189.106.124.34@pt.wikipedia

Thongkaka

Quintinense@commons and pt.wikipedia

ArikamaI@zh.wikipedia

Onetseneed@zh.wikipedia

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

See also