Stale

Sputnik

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 07:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Article(s): Sputnik

Request: remove distracting watermark... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

This is not a watermark! It's a part of the original picture, and I think it should stay there. Orionist ^talk 14:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree on this one. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 21:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

^{[clarification needed]}--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 03:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Resolved

Stop sign with pink streak on it

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Resolved

Stop sign with pink streak across it
correction

Article(s): MC Hammer

Request: I am not sure if the pink streak across the lower part of the stop sign is actually part of the sign, or a weird lighting effect from photographing it. Either way, though, the streak is distracting, and so I request that the pink streak be removed. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): New file at File:Brunswick-Stop-80s-time_edit.jpg Done Finemann (talk) 07:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

In the description of image we can read: "Vandalized stop sign at the Brunswick MARC station in Brunswick Maryland." So, I think, the pink strip shouldn't be removed. PawełMM (talk) 07:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

The description means that somebody wrote "Hammer Time" a catchphrase of MC Hammer on the sign, which attributed to vandalism. The pink strip has got nothing to do with this Finemann (talk) 07:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing the pink streak. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Cross of Merit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Resolved

png file

Article(s): Cross of Merit (Poland)

Request: clear background... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 09:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Request taken by PawełMM.

Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 11:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much!--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Empire of Japan

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Resolved

Article(s): Empire of Japan

Request: straighten and crop... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 11:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 14:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Hitlerjugend

Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Resolved

done
done
done
done-this one came out rough, can it be redone? Redone: right top fragment of the building retouched.
File:Hitlerjugend visit to Yasukuni Shrine State Shintō wreath procession kannushi 1938.png
done-please do this one without cropping, the gateway is important done (decropped)
done
done
done-this one came out rough, can it be redone? Redone - returned to original contrast & color.
done
done
done
done

Article(s): Hitlerjugend

Request: please dewatermark, I'm sorry for the mess, if I could do it myself, I would have before uploading... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 10:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): Done: Done all images as requested. PawełMM (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

That's a lot of hard work, thank you so much!--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 16:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Hmm.. I've decropped that one. I've also redone the magazine one, but Commons won't let me upload over, because it doesn't seem to realise the source and what not is already there.. I can email it to some one if they want to take a shot. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 17:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! Let me figure out the upload problem and get back to you!--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Great, thank you and sorry!--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Weimar

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Resolved

Article(s): Weimar

Request: remove watermark text, don't know if crackling can be fixed... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Done: Cropped by Ras67 & restored by PawełMM (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC).

Thanks, beautiful! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Portrait of William-B. Kurtz

Latest comment: 15 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Resolved

color changed to the old version
another suggestion by Orionist

Article(s): List of works by Thomas Eakins

Request: I uploaded the first version of this painting last year. Today, I got a much higher resolution scan of this painting. But, if you compare the new version of this painting (above) to the old version, the color balance in the new version is a bit off, and the new version has a spot on his forehead that shouldn't be there. Raul654 (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

PawełMM did the right thing by uploading the new image separately. Photography of artworks is very tricky, and it seems to me that the original colors could be either one of these. I haven't seen this painting in person, so I can't tell for sure. Hopefully Raul654 does. Regards -- Orionist ★ talk 17:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

I haven't seen the original painting firsthand because it's not in a public collection. It's owned by Daniel Dietrich II. I've asked Mr. Dietrich through a mutual friend if I can photograph his collection, but he hasn't gotten back to me yet.

Regardless, though, I'm not totally satisfied with PawełMM's version. This version (the old low-res one) seems to be exactly what we should be shooting for. The high resolution one I uploaded (above, left) has over-saturated skin tone; PawełMM's version has the right skin tone, but the rest of it looks washed out. Raul654 (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

There are two color changed versions. The second one is a bit little washed out. Please, compare with [1], if it is better - you can return to it. PawełMM (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

I hadn't noticed PawełMM's first uploaded version. That is exactly what I was looking for. I've tweaked it (photoshopped out a couple of dark specs that shouldn't have been there) and re-uploaded. Raul654 (talk) 21:34, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, it seems you guys have solved it while I was working on another version! I uploaded my suggestion above, where I also cropped the intrusive remnants of the frame. I kept de-saturation to a minimum to keep the rich colors captured in the high-res image. What do you think? -- Orionist ★ talk 22:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

I like it a lot. Great job. Raul654 (talk) 00:42, 2 July 2010 (UTC)