I added { { NPOV } } because these new critizisms of Klass are all one-sided. Bubba73 18:50, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
- OK, the NPOV has improved some, but I would still like to get unbiased third-party opinions. Bubba73 03:21, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
This is very POV. Virtually everything that's been added is anti-Klass. -Anonymous
disparaged?
The article says "The letter disparaged Friedman’s professional credentials as a nuclear physicist".
The actual letter says "He was trained as a nuclear physicist, worked in nuclear propulsion for five different companies in 14 years., before being laid off in the early 1070's and becoming a full-time UFO lecturer. He typically bills himself as the 'only nuclear physicists devoting full time to UFOs'. "
That doesn't seem very disparaging to me. The article Stanton Friedman says that he worked in nuclear physics 1956-1970, for five companies.
The letter goes on to say: "Freidman and I are 'friends' of sorts ... he can be a quite likable chap with a good sense of humor.
This article needs to be NPOV, not less. Bubba73 (talk) 20:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)